Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address info@exoticindia.com.

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Your Cart (0)
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > Philosophy > Analysis and Philosophy (An Old and Rare Book)
Displaying 45 of 2764         Previous  |  NextSubscribe to our newsletter and discounts
Analysis and Philosophy (An Old and Rare Book)
Pages from the book
Analysis and Philosophy (An Old and Rare Book)
Look Inside the Book
Description
Preface

This dissertation is the fruit of some intellectual labour for nearly a decade and a half. Some of my papers, published during this period in different Indian journals of philosophy have been incorporated in this treatise, although none of them in its original form. The published articles have been extensively re-cast and re-set to bring them in line with the present trend of thought and most of the materials of this dissertation are fresh and previously unpublished. Yet the substance of my papers published in Philosophical Quarterly, Amalner (now defunct), Journal of Indian Philosophical Association (Amravati), Calcutta Review (Calcutta University), Proceedings of the Indian Philosophical Congress, Rabindranath, Birth Centenary, Vol.III (Santiniketan), Rabindra Bharati University Journal, etc. has been incorporated in it.

I sent one of my published papers, a critique of Classical Logical Positivism, to Professor A.J. Ayer for his opinion. One of my former students, who was then a student of Professor Ayer in London, acted as the bridge. My student, after some time, wrote back to me the written comment of Professor Ayer on my paper, which ran as follows:

‘It [the article] seems to me to give a good summary of what might be called the classical logical positivist position. The best critical point is that the verification principle has never yet been adequately stated in a way that establishes a tenable frontier between science and metaphysics. I wish, however, that the writer and gone on to suggest some alternative criterion, or perhaps to argue that no criterion was possible or necessary; but I dare say he will be more venturesome on some other occasion.’ Since then I have been interested in finding the desired criterion of demarcating the boundaries of science and philosophy and the present dissertation is the result of that interest.

I could not, however, be adversely critical of the modern analytic movement in England and America as I have followed it. The problem of meaning, and, consequently, the problem of analysis of linguistic expressions, seem to me to be central in philosophy. Meaning does not hang in the air; it is a parasite on symbolic devices—verbal or non-verbal. This leads me to conclude that language and thought are identical, though both fall short of reality. Philosophy is concerned with the meaning and significance of speakable contents with the realm of facts. Ontology or metaphysics does not give us a knowledge of reality, whether singular or plural, sensible or super-sensible. It only analyses the meaning of being or reality as such and deduces consequences of such definitions.

I have endeavoured to establish here that analyses of crucial concepts and categories that govern our experience of everyday world, as given by recent Anglo-American language- philosophers, are not final and there may be several alternative analyses of such concepts, giving rise to alternative philosophical theories. In compliance with this view I have analysed the concepts of ‘the true’ and ‘the good’ in Chapter VI and of ‘the personal’ and ‘the impersonal’ in the last chapter in a somewhat original manner. Of course, my studies are naturally limited and I do not claim my analysis to be anything final. But I have sought to practise analysis which, I think, is true philosophical work. What my thesis seeks to do is not the demolition of earlier views in this regard, but removal of what appears to me the lapses and shortcomings in them by positive and constructive analysis.

I have maintained a radical distinction between science and philosophy with reference to the distinction between ‘knowing’ and ‘understanding’ (Chapter VII). I maintain that philosophy understands ‘meanings’ whereas science knows ‘facts’. Hence they differ both is their subject-matter and in their methods of investigation. The method of philosophy is speculative and not empirical like that of science. Hence science and philosophy do not meet at any point. Philosophy never gives us any knowledge of facts—empirical or transcendental.

I have received some hints from the writings of Professor Krishnachandra Bhattacharyya of the University of Calcutta as I have understood that subtle thinker. I, of course, take the entire responsibility for the view propounded here. Though I have sought to follow tradition in philosophy, my approach to the problems may appear to be novel.

I further seek to show that ‘arguments’ and ‘explanations’, used by a scientist and a philosopher respectively are radically different. I maintain that ‘the logic of proof’ can be distinguished from ‘the logic of elaboration’ (Chapter IX) and that the former is scientific argument whereas the latter is used in matters philosophical. Here also the reader may find some new and original thoughts. I have tried to revive important subtle ideas that were lost in the jungle of various theories and verbal duels in the history of Western philosophy. A perusal of the dissertation may show that even the ancient thinkers like Socrates, Plato and Aristotle as well as the ancient Indian philosophers realised that the true business of philosophy was really concerned with meanings; only latter thinkers sometimes diverged from the main current of thought. We are, even today, interested in philosophical theories propounded by Aristotle, though we are not so interested in his scientific theories. In philosophy tradition goes on but in science it is not so.

Contents

Preface(v)
Chapter OneAge of Analysis1
Chapter TwoLanguage and Thought9
Chapter ThreeLanguage and Reality20
Chapter FourPhilosophy and Ordinary Language41
Chapter FiveCriterion of Meaning70
Chapter SixThe True' and 'The Good'110
Chapter SevenKnowing and Understanding137
Chapter EightMeaning, Implication and Philosophy152
Chapter NineArguments and Explanations (Scientific and Philosophical)169
Chapter TenPhilosophy and Self-consciousness183
postscript196
Bibliography199

Sample Pages

















Analysis and Philosophy (An Old and Rare Book)

Item Code:
NAM014
Cover:
Paperback
Edition:
1982
Language:
English
Size:
8.5 inch x 5.0 inch
Pages:
218
Other Details:
Weight of the Book: 220 gms
Price:
$20.00   Shipping Free
Look Inside the Book
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
Analysis and Philosophy (An Old and Rare Book)

Verify the characters on the left

From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 679 times since 7th Jun, 2017
Preface

This dissertation is the fruit of some intellectual labour for nearly a decade and a half. Some of my papers, published during this period in different Indian journals of philosophy have been incorporated in this treatise, although none of them in its original form. The published articles have been extensively re-cast and re-set to bring them in line with the present trend of thought and most of the materials of this dissertation are fresh and previously unpublished. Yet the substance of my papers published in Philosophical Quarterly, Amalner (now defunct), Journal of Indian Philosophical Association (Amravati), Calcutta Review (Calcutta University), Proceedings of the Indian Philosophical Congress, Rabindranath, Birth Centenary, Vol.III (Santiniketan), Rabindra Bharati University Journal, etc. has been incorporated in it.

I sent one of my published papers, a critique of Classical Logical Positivism, to Professor A.J. Ayer for his opinion. One of my former students, who was then a student of Professor Ayer in London, acted as the bridge. My student, after some time, wrote back to me the written comment of Professor Ayer on my paper, which ran as follows:

‘It [the article] seems to me to give a good summary of what might be called the classical logical positivist position. The best critical point is that the verification principle has never yet been adequately stated in a way that establishes a tenable frontier between science and metaphysics. I wish, however, that the writer and gone on to suggest some alternative criterion, or perhaps to argue that no criterion was possible or necessary; but I dare say he will be more venturesome on some other occasion.’ Since then I have been interested in finding the desired criterion of demarcating the boundaries of science and philosophy and the present dissertation is the result of that interest.

I could not, however, be adversely critical of the modern analytic movement in England and America as I have followed it. The problem of meaning, and, consequently, the problem of analysis of linguistic expressions, seem to me to be central in philosophy. Meaning does not hang in the air; it is a parasite on symbolic devices—verbal or non-verbal. This leads me to conclude that language and thought are identical, though both fall short of reality. Philosophy is concerned with the meaning and significance of speakable contents with the realm of facts. Ontology or metaphysics does not give us a knowledge of reality, whether singular or plural, sensible or super-sensible. It only analyses the meaning of being or reality as such and deduces consequences of such definitions.

I have endeavoured to establish here that analyses of crucial concepts and categories that govern our experience of everyday world, as given by recent Anglo-American language- philosophers, are not final and there may be several alternative analyses of such concepts, giving rise to alternative philosophical theories. In compliance with this view I have analysed the concepts of ‘the true’ and ‘the good’ in Chapter VI and of ‘the personal’ and ‘the impersonal’ in the last chapter in a somewhat original manner. Of course, my studies are naturally limited and I do not claim my analysis to be anything final. But I have sought to practise analysis which, I think, is true philosophical work. What my thesis seeks to do is not the demolition of earlier views in this regard, but removal of what appears to me the lapses and shortcomings in them by positive and constructive analysis.

I have maintained a radical distinction between science and philosophy with reference to the distinction between ‘knowing’ and ‘understanding’ (Chapter VII). I maintain that philosophy understands ‘meanings’ whereas science knows ‘facts’. Hence they differ both is their subject-matter and in their methods of investigation. The method of philosophy is speculative and not empirical like that of science. Hence science and philosophy do not meet at any point. Philosophy never gives us any knowledge of facts—empirical or transcendental.

I have received some hints from the writings of Professor Krishnachandra Bhattacharyya of the University of Calcutta as I have understood that subtle thinker. I, of course, take the entire responsibility for the view propounded here. Though I have sought to follow tradition in philosophy, my approach to the problems may appear to be novel.

I further seek to show that ‘arguments’ and ‘explanations’, used by a scientist and a philosopher respectively are radically different. I maintain that ‘the logic of proof’ can be distinguished from ‘the logic of elaboration’ (Chapter IX) and that the former is scientific argument whereas the latter is used in matters philosophical. Here also the reader may find some new and original thoughts. I have tried to revive important subtle ideas that were lost in the jungle of various theories and verbal duels in the history of Western philosophy. A perusal of the dissertation may show that even the ancient thinkers like Socrates, Plato and Aristotle as well as the ancient Indian philosophers realised that the true business of philosophy was really concerned with meanings; only latter thinkers sometimes diverged from the main current of thought. We are, even today, interested in philosophical theories propounded by Aristotle, though we are not so interested in his scientific theories. In philosophy tradition goes on but in science it is not so.

Contents

Preface(v)
Chapter OneAge of Analysis1
Chapter TwoLanguage and Thought9
Chapter ThreeLanguage and Reality20
Chapter FourPhilosophy and Ordinary Language41
Chapter FiveCriterion of Meaning70
Chapter SixThe True' and 'The Good'110
Chapter SevenKnowing and Understanding137
Chapter EightMeaning, Implication and Philosophy152
Chapter NineArguments and Explanations (Scientific and Philosophical)169
Chapter TenPhilosophy and Self-consciousness183
postscript196
Bibliography199

Sample Pages

















Post a Comment
 
Post Review
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy

Related Items

An Analysis of Dream in Indian Philosophy
by Satyajit Layek
Hardcover (Edition: 1990)
Sri Sat Guru Publications
Item Code: IDH590
$19.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Bhagavadgita - An Introductory Analysis
by Brajakishore Swain
Paperback (Edition: 2014)
Akshaya Prakashan
Item Code: NAN109
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Buddhist Theory of Meaning and Literary Analysis
by R.K. Mishra
Hardcover (Edition: 1965)
D. K. Printworld
Item Code: IDD149
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Sankalpasuryodaya (A Literary Analysis)
by R. Laxmi
Hardcover (Edition: 2008)
Sharada Publishing House
Item Code: NAL583
$40.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Advaita - A Conceptual Analysis
by A. Ramamurty
Hardcover (Edition: 1996)
D. K. Printworld (P) Ltd.
Item Code: IDD121
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
An Analysis of The Brahma Sutra
by Swami Krishnananda
Paperback (Edition: 2000)
The Divine Life Society
Item Code: IDG340
$7.50
Add to Cart
Buy Now

Testimonials

I love this web site and love coming to see what you have online.
Glenn, Australia
Received package today, thank you! Love how everything was packed, I especially enjoyed the fabric covering! Thank you for all you do!
Frances, Austin, Texas
Hi, just got my order! Wow! Soooooo beautiful!!! I'm so happy! You rock, thank you!
Amy, Malibu, USA
Nice website..has a collection of rare books.
Srikanth
Beautiful products nicely presented and easy to use website
Amanda, UK.
I received my order, very very beautiful products. I hope to buy something more. Thank you!
Gulnora, Uzbekistan
Thank you very much for the courtesy you showed me for the time I buy my books. The last book is a good book. İt is important in terms of recognizing fine art of İndia.
Suzan, Turkey
Thank You very much Sir. I really like the saree and the blouse fit perfeact. Thank You again.
Sulbha, USA
I have received the parcel yesterday and the shiv-linga idol is sooo beautiful and u have exceeded my expectations...
Guruprasad, Bangalore
Yesterday I received my lost and through you again found order. Very quickly I must say !. Thank you and thank you again for your service. I am very happy with this double CD of Ustad Shujaat Husain Khan. I thought it was lost forever and now I can add it to my CD collection. I hope in the near future to buy again at your online shop. You have wonderful items to offer !
Joke van der Baars, the Netherlands
TRUSTe
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2017 © Exotic India