Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address info@exoticindia.com.

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Your Cart (0)
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > History > The Law of Evidence in Ancient India
Displaying 118 of 4966         Previous  |  NextSubscribe to our newsletter and discounts
The Law of Evidence in Ancient India
The Law of Evidence in Ancient India
Description

About the Book

 

The book is a critical study of the law of evidence in ancient India from the days of Gautama and other ancient lawgivers and the centuries. It is a branch of legal as well as social history of India.

 

The book is divided into six chapters beginning with the problem of proof where problems like burden of proof and modes of proof where problems like burden of proof and modes of proof are dealt with. This is followed by a chapter on witness where admissibility of evidence and competency (or want there of) of witness are dealt with analytically. Production and examination of witnesses in court is also elaborated perjury, contumacy and other problems are also discussed. The next chapter deals with public and private documents, their evidentiary values, forgery, old documents and other problem, possession and ownership are the subject matters of the next chapter ordeals and special oaths are discussed in the fifth chapter. The concluding chapter analyses the materials discussed in the earlier chapter to find out if the law of evidence in ancient India could ensure justice.

 

A comparison of the law in ancient India with Roman law. The Muslim law mediaeval British law and modern law has also been made wherever such comparison has been found relevant.

 

The author is grateful to Honourable Sri Gati-krushna Misra, Retired Chief Justice of Orissa High Court for his foreword to the book.

 

About the Author

 

Dr. Shraddhakar Supakar, M.A., LL.M., Ph.D., Sahityacharya was formerly. The Dean of the faculty of law Sambalpur University, Orissa. Born in Sambalpur town in 1914, the began practice as a lawyer, after a brilliant academic career. He was elected to the Orissa Legislative Assembly in 1949, 1952 and 1985. He was a member of Lok Sabha in 1957-62 and 1965-67. He has been associated with the Utkal the Sambalpur and the Sri Jagannath Sanskrit Universities for a long period as a member of senates and the syndicates. He taught law in the Lajpatrai Law College from 1971 to 1975 and later joined as the principal of the above law college and worked from 1976 to 1978. He worked as a vice chancellor of Sri Jagannath Sanskrit VisvavidyalayaPuri in 1983. He was also a member of the Official Languages (Legislative) Commission, Government of India, New Delhi (1975-76). His field of specialization is family law.

 

Foreword

 

Dr. Shraddhakar Supakar needs no introduction. He is a prodigious scholar in diverse subjects-Sanskrit, Mathematics, English literature and Law. He has utilised his deep knowledge in Sanskrit language to study the Law of evidence as prevalent in ancient India which was ennunciated by great thinkers and jurists like Manu, YajnavalkyaNaradBrihaspatiKatyayana and Vyasa: to name a few. With the evolution of society, socialpolitical and economic thoughts and philosophy changed. Law is always moulded commensurate with the changing needs of a dynamic society. Some of the Laws of evidence prevalent in ancient India may appear to us as archaic and sometimes inhuman; yet many of the modem concepts of the Law of evidence were identical and similar to those as existed in ancient IndiaThings must be judged in their own context in relation to the prevalent conditions of a particular society.

 

Dr. Supakar has made a valuable contribution to the knowledge of Law by giving a clear analysis and comparative history of the old and the new. By going through this treatise, my own knowledge of Law has been enriched and I have no doubtthat studentof Law and History would find it verinteresting and instructive.

 

Introduction

 

1When I began my studies for a doctoral degree in lawI conceived the idea of a comparatively obscure and virgin field of "ThAdjective Law iAncient India". When I submitted the synopsis to the University for the approval of the concerned authorities, somof thlearned members, not familiar with legal jargons, werintrigued bthe use of the term "Adjective".

 

2As I proceedewith thtask of writing out the thesisI foundto mdismay, that the field of research is too widand too ambitious, I, thereforeconcentrated my attention on the limitesubject of "ThLaw oProcedurinAncient India". Later onI revised the synopsis and resubmitted it on the aforesaid subject and finallsubmitted my thesion "The Law of Procedure in Ancient India". It was bulkenougfor a thesis. As even Dr. Kanhad not dealt with the procedural Law of thDharmasastra iany detailthought it worth while writing book on thsubjectam njudge othemerit of that bookPerhapthe examiners were satisfied with the merit as welas thbulk of that thesis and considered me not unworthy of the degree odoctorate.

 

3. While studying the law of procedure iancient India in some depthhad tstudy the law of evidence iancient IndiaThat is also a gooand propesubjecfor study. Not much work habeen done on that subjectI found a reference to a book on this subject by Dr. Amareswar Thakur from the Historof DharmasastraI have not the goofortune of studyin"The HindLaw of Evidence"written bDrThakur, The book is out of print since long. But I am very fortunate imaking a study of the source materials of the Dharmasastrasthe Dharmasastras anthcommentators, have formed mowjudgment from these source materials. Other handicaps arthe great distances of the placeof big libraries like Calcutta, Delhi, PooneBombay and Madras. -Therefore, I havnot quoted asmany learned authors as I should have liked to do, and have given my own observations and interpretations othe field omy study and research. I am certain of one remark, which I may make here. Not much work has been done on this subject (of my study in recent times. In subjects like constitution and .commercial law, important and learned books are published in appreciable number not only in India but also in other countries as well. But unfortunately for us in India, not much research work on the rich mine of Dharmasastric law is undertaken.

 

4. The reason is not far to seekLegal History of India which the students of law (and also the advocates and judges) in India have to study begins with the year 1600 A.D., as if there was no law in this country prior to that date. It cannot 'be denied that law existed in this country from the dawn of Aryan Civilization. Whether that law conforms to the definition of law by eminent jurists like Austin, is another matter. But it certainly had the same force in India for milenia in the same sense as Roman law had its force in Roman empire and 'her colonies, not only during the heydays of Roman glory but even centuries after the fall of the Roman empire, Roman law 'was taught as a subject of study in law colleges in India some -decades ago. It is still studied in postgraduate law classes. Why 'is it still a subject for study in Britain and other countries? To meet the objection that a knowledge of Roman law is of no use at all in the legal profession, Professor Sherman said :

 

"It is based on the assumption that because the Roman state and tribunals persisted centuries ago, therefore Roman law itself also has long been dead. Now this conception of the fate 'of Roman law is historically inaccurate and false. The spirit 'of Roman law did not die-on the contrary it is still very much alive in our midst. (Moreover it was the majestic and beneficial Roman law, which more than any other single element brought civilization back to Europe, following the barbaric deluge of dark age").

 

5. This remark of ProfSherman applies mutatis mutandis to the possible objection that "a knowledge of ancient law of India is of no use at all in the legal studies in modern India".

 

6. Sir H. S. Maine says : "Hindu law has the oldest pedigree of any known system -of jurisprudence and even now it shows no sign of decreptitude. At this age, it governs races of men extending from Cashmere to cape Comorin, who agree in nothing else except their sub-mission to itNo time or trouble can be wasted, which is spent in investigating the origiand development of such a system and the cause of its influence"

 

Therefore, a study of the law of Evidence iancient India is also worth while.

 

7. There is not enough material for the social history of IndiaIndian History, as we know it, consists mostly of the political history of India. Kings and their kingdoms, rise and fall of dynasties, wars and their consequences have been dealt with in most history booksAbout the great religious reformers, poets, philosophers and saints some mention is made. The puranas and kavyas deal with gods and kings, their loves and heroism. But how did the common man live? How did the society function? The social history of India, of which the history of law is only a branch, has not been adequately dealt with by historians and scholars.

 

8. The study of legal history of ancient India gives us some insight of the social systemIt deals with the common man, the litigants crimes and punishment, the system of espionage, the law of gamblers, thieves, prostitutes, slaves, artisans and even tells of a valid partnership among thieves and robbers. There is a happy blend of the ideal and the real in the law laid down by the Smritis and the ArthasastraKautilya deals with, not merely the legal, but also the social and economic problems of his days. Ambassadors and spies, royal dancers and prostitutes, saints and beggars, black-marketeers and gamblers, magicians, judges, washermen, weaversgoldsmiths, the problems of slaves and their manumission, sanitation of towns and villages, have been dealt with by the lawgivers. Not enough has been written about them, because not adequate attention has as yet been paid to the social and legal history of IndiaLaw does not operate in a vaccumbut is related to and functions in the society in which it is applied. Therefore, it is necessary to give a bird's eye view of the social system in which it operated.

 

Society in ancient India was divided into four varnas and several Jatis (or mixed varnas) , or castes, and four Ashramas or orders of life. The law is different for different varnas and differentAshramas. Men and women ohiglier varnas enjoyedcertain privileges. Thus, foexample, shrotaya (a Brahmana versed in the vedas) was exempted from appearing in a court .as a witness. The oaths and ordeals administered to him were different from the forms of oaths and the nature of ordeals administered to a kshatriyaVaishya or Sudra. The weight attached to his oral evidence in court was greaterThese privileges were granted to a Brahmana on the assumption that he could be learned and busy in sacrifice, or teaching the sacred lores. But when a Brahmana took to the occupation of a cowhered, merchant, or servant, he could not claim the same privilege as an ideal Brahmana, However, in course of time, the privilege of caste by birth was granted by the courts.

 

9. In awarding punishment or coming to a judgment, the castes of the complainant (or the plaintiff), and that of the accused (or the defendant), and the subject matter of the transaction were very relevant and important. Thus the theft of gold of a Brahmana was a more serious offence than the theft of gold of any other man. Brahmana assaulting a Shudra got off with light punishment whereas a Shudra assaulting a Brahmana was punished very severly. Killing prostitute was a light offence, but killing a learned Brahmana was a serious offence, as well as a great sin.

 

10. Though Buddhism and Jainism led to a protest against the privileges of higher castes, no Buddhist or Jaina lawgiver provided any alternative to the system of law laid down in the Dharmasastras.

 

11The sources of law, according to ancient scriptures, were: (a) the Shruti or the vedas, (b) the smritis or the Dharmasutras and the Dharmasastras, and (c) Sadachara (literally the conduct of good people) or custom. Manu says that besides shruti, the smritis and sadachara, what is agreeable to oneself is also a source of Dharma. Yajnavalkya adds a fifth source, namely, desire born out of due deliberations.

 

12. Veda, the word of God is of unquestionable authority, which every political sovereign is most imperatively enjoined to obey and enforce as law. However, there is not much of positive law inshruti. Reference to the matters dealing with the law of evidence in shruti has been made in some places in the different chapters of this book.

 

The Law of Evidence in Ancient India

Item Code:
NAH105
Cover:
Hardcover
Edition:
1990
Publisher:
ISBN:
8185094242
Language:
English
Size:
8.5 inch x 5.5 inch
Pages:
322
Other Details:
Weight of the Book: 380 gms
Price:
$30.00   Shipping Free
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
The Law of Evidence in Ancient India

Verify the characters on the left

From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 2351 times since 19th Jul, 2017

About the Book

 

The book is a critical study of the law of evidence in ancient India from the days of Gautama and other ancient lawgivers and the centuries. It is a branch of legal as well as social history of India.

 

The book is divided into six chapters beginning with the problem of proof where problems like burden of proof and modes of proof where problems like burden of proof and modes of proof are dealt with. This is followed by a chapter on witness where admissibility of evidence and competency (or want there of) of witness are dealt with analytically. Production and examination of witnesses in court is also elaborated perjury, contumacy and other problems are also discussed. The next chapter deals with public and private documents, their evidentiary values, forgery, old documents and other problem, possession and ownership are the subject matters of the next chapter ordeals and special oaths are discussed in the fifth chapter. The concluding chapter analyses the materials discussed in the earlier chapter to find out if the law of evidence in ancient India could ensure justice.

 

A comparison of the law in ancient India with Roman law. The Muslim law mediaeval British law and modern law has also been made wherever such comparison has been found relevant.

 

The author is grateful to Honourable Sri Gati-krushna Misra, Retired Chief Justice of Orissa High Court for his foreword to the book.

 

About the Author

 

Dr. Shraddhakar Supakar, M.A., LL.M., Ph.D., Sahityacharya was formerly. The Dean of the faculty of law Sambalpur University, Orissa. Born in Sambalpur town in 1914, the began practice as a lawyer, after a brilliant academic career. He was elected to the Orissa Legislative Assembly in 1949, 1952 and 1985. He was a member of Lok Sabha in 1957-62 and 1965-67. He has been associated with the Utkal the Sambalpur and the Sri Jagannath Sanskrit Universities for a long period as a member of senates and the syndicates. He taught law in the Lajpatrai Law College from 1971 to 1975 and later joined as the principal of the above law college and worked from 1976 to 1978. He worked as a vice chancellor of Sri Jagannath Sanskrit VisvavidyalayaPuri in 1983. He was also a member of the Official Languages (Legislative) Commission, Government of India, New Delhi (1975-76). His field of specialization is family law.

 

Foreword

 

Dr. Shraddhakar Supakar needs no introduction. He is a prodigious scholar in diverse subjects-Sanskrit, Mathematics, English literature and Law. He has utilised his deep knowledge in Sanskrit language to study the Law of evidence as prevalent in ancient India which was ennunciated by great thinkers and jurists like Manu, YajnavalkyaNaradBrihaspatiKatyayana and Vyasa: to name a few. With the evolution of society, socialpolitical and economic thoughts and philosophy changed. Law is always moulded commensurate with the changing needs of a dynamic society. Some of the Laws of evidence prevalent in ancient India may appear to us as archaic and sometimes inhuman; yet many of the modem concepts of the Law of evidence were identical and similar to those as existed in ancient IndiaThings must be judged in their own context in relation to the prevalent conditions of a particular society.

 

Dr. Supakar has made a valuable contribution to the knowledge of Law by giving a clear analysis and comparative history of the old and the new. By going through this treatise, my own knowledge of Law has been enriched and I have no doubtthat studentof Law and History would find it verinteresting and instructive.

 

Introduction

 

1When I began my studies for a doctoral degree in lawI conceived the idea of a comparatively obscure and virgin field of "ThAdjective Law iAncient India". When I submitted the synopsis to the University for the approval of the concerned authorities, somof thlearned members, not familiar with legal jargons, werintrigued bthe use of the term "Adjective".

 

2As I proceedewith thtask of writing out the thesisI foundto mdismay, that the field of research is too widand too ambitious, I, thereforeconcentrated my attention on the limitesubject of "ThLaw oProcedurinAncient India". Later onI revised the synopsis and resubmitted it on the aforesaid subject and finallsubmitted my thesion "The Law of Procedure in Ancient India". It was bulkenougfor a thesis. As even Dr. Kanhad not dealt with the procedural Law of thDharmasastra iany detailthought it worth while writing book on thsubjectam njudge othemerit of that bookPerhapthe examiners were satisfied with the merit as welas thbulk of that thesis and considered me not unworthy of the degree odoctorate.

 

3. While studying the law of procedure iancient India in some depthhad tstudy the law of evidence iancient IndiaThat is also a gooand propesubjecfor study. Not much work habeen done on that subjectI found a reference to a book on this subject by Dr. Amareswar Thakur from the Historof DharmasastraI have not the goofortune of studyin"The HindLaw of Evidence"written bDrThakur, The book is out of print since long. But I am very fortunate imaking a study of the source materials of the Dharmasastrasthe Dharmasastras anthcommentators, have formed mowjudgment from these source materials. Other handicaps arthe great distances of the placeof big libraries like Calcutta, Delhi, PooneBombay and Madras. -Therefore, I havnot quoted asmany learned authors as I should have liked to do, and have given my own observations and interpretations othe field omy study and research. I am certain of one remark, which I may make here. Not much work has been done on this subject (of my study in recent times. In subjects like constitution and .commercial law, important and learned books are published in appreciable number not only in India but also in other countries as well. But unfortunately for us in India, not much research work on the rich mine of Dharmasastric law is undertaken.

 

4. The reason is not far to seekLegal History of India which the students of law (and also the advocates and judges) in India have to study begins with the year 1600 A.D., as if there was no law in this country prior to that date. It cannot 'be denied that law existed in this country from the dawn of Aryan Civilization. Whether that law conforms to the definition of law by eminent jurists like Austin, is another matter. But it certainly had the same force in India for milenia in the same sense as Roman law had its force in Roman empire and 'her colonies, not only during the heydays of Roman glory but even centuries after the fall of the Roman empire, Roman law 'was taught as a subject of study in law colleges in India some -decades ago. It is still studied in postgraduate law classes. Why 'is it still a subject for study in Britain and other countries? To meet the objection that a knowledge of Roman law is of no use at all in the legal profession, Professor Sherman said :

 

"It is based on the assumption that because the Roman state and tribunals persisted centuries ago, therefore Roman law itself also has long been dead. Now this conception of the fate 'of Roman law is historically inaccurate and false. The spirit 'of Roman law did not die-on the contrary it is still very much alive in our midst. (Moreover it was the majestic and beneficial Roman law, which more than any other single element brought civilization back to Europe, following the barbaric deluge of dark age").

 

5. This remark of ProfSherman applies mutatis mutandis to the possible objection that "a knowledge of ancient law of India is of no use at all in the legal studies in modern India".

 

6. Sir H. S. Maine says : "Hindu law has the oldest pedigree of any known system -of jurisprudence and even now it shows no sign of decreptitude. At this age, it governs races of men extending from Cashmere to cape Comorin, who agree in nothing else except their sub-mission to itNo time or trouble can be wasted, which is spent in investigating the origiand development of such a system and the cause of its influence"

 

Therefore, a study of the law of Evidence iancient India is also worth while.

 

7. There is not enough material for the social history of IndiaIndian History, as we know it, consists mostly of the political history of India. Kings and their kingdoms, rise and fall of dynasties, wars and their consequences have been dealt with in most history booksAbout the great religious reformers, poets, philosophers and saints some mention is made. The puranas and kavyas deal with gods and kings, their loves and heroism. But how did the common man live? How did the society function? The social history of India, of which the history of law is only a branch, has not been adequately dealt with by historians and scholars.

 

8. The study of legal history of ancient India gives us some insight of the social systemIt deals with the common man, the litigants crimes and punishment, the system of espionage, the law of gamblers, thieves, prostitutes, slaves, artisans and even tells of a valid partnership among thieves and robbers. There is a happy blend of the ideal and the real in the law laid down by the Smritis and the ArthasastraKautilya deals with, not merely the legal, but also the social and economic problems of his days. Ambassadors and spies, royal dancers and prostitutes, saints and beggars, black-marketeers and gamblers, magicians, judges, washermen, weaversgoldsmiths, the problems of slaves and their manumission, sanitation of towns and villages, have been dealt with by the lawgivers. Not enough has been written about them, because not adequate attention has as yet been paid to the social and legal history of IndiaLaw does not operate in a vaccumbut is related to and functions in the society in which it is applied. Therefore, it is necessary to give a bird's eye view of the social system in which it operated.

 

Society in ancient India was divided into four varnas and several Jatis (or mixed varnas) , or castes, and four Ashramas or orders of life. The law is different for different varnas and differentAshramas. Men and women ohiglier varnas enjoyedcertain privileges. Thus, foexample, shrotaya (a Brahmana versed in the vedas) was exempted from appearing in a court .as a witness. The oaths and ordeals administered to him were different from the forms of oaths and the nature of ordeals administered to a kshatriyaVaishya or Sudra. The weight attached to his oral evidence in court was greaterThese privileges were granted to a Brahmana on the assumption that he could be learned and busy in sacrifice, or teaching the sacred lores. But when a Brahmana took to the occupation of a cowhered, merchant, or servant, he could not claim the same privilege as an ideal Brahmana, However, in course of time, the privilege of caste by birth was granted by the courts.

 

9. In awarding punishment or coming to a judgment, the castes of the complainant (or the plaintiff), and that of the accused (or the defendant), and the subject matter of the transaction were very relevant and important. Thus the theft of gold of a Brahmana was a more serious offence than the theft of gold of any other man. Brahmana assaulting a Shudra got off with light punishment whereas a Shudra assaulting a Brahmana was punished very severly. Killing prostitute was a light offence, but killing a learned Brahmana was a serious offence, as well as a great sin.

 

10. Though Buddhism and Jainism led to a protest against the privileges of higher castes, no Buddhist or Jaina lawgiver provided any alternative to the system of law laid down in the Dharmasastras.

 

11The sources of law, according to ancient scriptures, were: (a) the Shruti or the vedas, (b) the smritis or the Dharmasutras and the Dharmasastras, and (c) Sadachara (literally the conduct of good people) or custom. Manu says that besides shruti, the smritis and sadachara, what is agreeable to oneself is also a source of Dharma. Yajnavalkya adds a fifth source, namely, desire born out of due deliberations.

 

12. Veda, the word of God is of unquestionable authority, which every political sovereign is most imperatively enjoined to obey and enforce as law. However, there is not much of positive law inshruti. Reference to the matters dealing with the law of evidence in shruti has been made in some places in the different chapters of this book.

 

Post a Comment
 
Post Review
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy

Related Items

Ancient Indian Law (Eternal Values in Manusmriti)
Item Code: NAN214
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Marriage and Its Discontents (Women Islam and The Law in India)
Item Code: NAJ149
$40.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Minor Law- Books (Part I: Narada Brihaspati)
Item Code: NAN057
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Law of Continence: Gandhi for 21st Century
by Anand T. Hingorani
Paperback (Edition: 1998)
Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan
Item Code: NAE429
$10.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Mimamsa Jurisprudence (The Source of Hindu Law)
Item Code: NAE722
$20.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Sales and Contract in Early Islamic Commercial Law
by ‘Abdullah ‘Alwi Haji Hassan
Hardcover (Edition: 2006)
Kitab Bhavan
Item Code: NAJ294
$15.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Family Law (Set of 2 Volumes)
by Flavia Agnes
Paperback (Edition: 2011)
Oxford University Press
Item Code: NAG341
$65.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
A Sanskrit Dictionary of Law and Statecraft
by Patrick Olivelle
Hardcover (Edition: 2015)
Primus Books
Item Code: NAL952
$50.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Legends in Law (Our Great Forebears)
Item Code: NAG358
$35.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Hinduism and Divorce from Dharmasastras to Statutory Law (In Two Volumes)
Deal 15% Off
by Hari Dev Kohli
Hardcover (Edition: 2000)
Decent Books
Item Code: IDL174
$55.00$46.75
You save: $8.25 (15%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Concept of Theft in Classical Hindu Law
Item Code: IDD972
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now

Testimonials

Very grateful for this service, of making this precious treasure of Haveli Sangeet for ThakurJi so easily in the US. Appreciate the fact that notation is provided.
Leena, USA.
The Bhairava painting I ordered by Sri Kailash Raj is excellent. I have been purchasing from Exotic India for well over a decade and am always beyond delighted with my extraordinary purchases and customer service. Thank you.
Marc, UK
I have been buying from Exotic India for years and am always pleased and excited to receive my packages. Thanks for the quality products.
Delia, USA
As ever, brilliant price and service.
Howard, UK.
The best and fastest service worldwide - I am in Australia and I put in a big order of books (14 items) on a Wednesday; it was sent on Friday and arrived at my doorstep early on Monday morning - amazing! All very securely packed in a very strong cardboard box. I have bought several times from Exotic India and the service is always exceptionally good. THANK YOU and NAMASTE!
Charles (Rudra)
I just wanted to say that this is I think my 3rd (big) order from you, and the last two times I received immaculate service, the books arrived well and it has been a very pleasant experience. Just wanted to say thanks for your efficient service.
Shantala, Belgium
Thank you so much EXOTIC INDIA for the wonderfull packaging!! I received my order today and it was gift wrapped with so much love and taste in a beautiful golden gift wrap and everything was neat and beautifully packed. Also my order came very fast... i am impressed! Besides selling fantastic items, you provide an exceptional customer service and i will surely purchase again from you! I am very glad and happy :) Thank you, Salma
Salma, Canada.
Artwork received today. Very pleased both with the product quality and speed of delivery. Many thanks for your help.
Carl, UK.
I wanted to let you know how happy we are with our framed pieces of Shree Durga and Shree Kali. Thank you and thank your framers for us. By the way, this month we offered a Puja and Yagna to the Ardhanarishwara murti we purchased from you last November. The Brahmin priest, Shree Vivek Godbol, who was visiting LA preformed the rites. He really loved our murti and thought it very paka. I am so happy to have found your site , it is very paka and trustworthy. Plus such great packing and quick shipping. Thanks for your service Vipin, it is a pleasure.
Gina, USA
My marble statue of Durga arrived today in perfect condition, it's such a beautiful statue. Thanks again for giving me a discount on it, I'm always very pleased with the items I order from you. You always have the best quality items.
Charles, Tennessee
TRUSTe
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2017 © Exotic India