Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address info@exoticindia.com.

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Your Cart (0)
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > History > Understanding Indian Society (Past and Present)
Displaying 981 of 4829         Previous  |  NextSubscribe to our newsletter and discounts
Understanding Indian Society (Past and Present)
Understanding Indian Society (Past and Present)
Description

About the Book

 

Understanding Indian Society brings together a collection of writings by eminent scholars across disciplines that capture the dynamic character of Indian society. The fifteen essays focus on four vital areas-gender relations, religion, developmental concerns and social change, and the future of the discipline of sociology.

 

The volume explores a wide range of issues as varied as Muslim women's struggle for independence in a patriarchal society colonial linkages of female foeticide, religious and communal conflicts, dilemmas of practising medical ethics, participation of the Patidar diaspora in the prosperity of the Gujarati Community, among others. Taken together, the collection demonstrates the analytical richness of current scholarship and gives fresh insights into the society of India. Commemorating Professor A.M. Shah's work in the contemporary context, the contributors highlight the major role he played in the growth of sociology as a discipline.

 

The book will be of interest to specialists in gender studies, sociology of family and religion, medical sociology and development studies. It will also appeal to readers interested in the complex structure and practices of Indian society.

 

About the Author

 

B.S. Baviskar is senior Fellow, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi.

 

Tulsi Patel is Professor of Sociology University of Delhi

 

Introduction

 

In an academic career spanning over five decades, Arvindbhai Manilal Shah (born 22 August 1931) totally dedicated himself to teaching, research, and other professional duties. This volume celebrates his varied and valued contributions while he was, at the same time, a teacher, researcher, and professional colleague. It contains fourteen essays on various themes, presented by his students and colleagues, as a modest tribute to him. It ends in an epilogue written by his close friend, N. R. Sheth, about 'the man and his work'.

 

We begin with a brief review of Shah's major contributions to development of sociology and social anthropology in India. His contributions may not be dazzling, but they are solid, original, and fundamental to the growth of the discipline. Given the constraint of space, we concentrate on his contributions to the study of the family, the caste system, Hinduism and its sects, village communities, and historical sociology. This does not mean, however, that his contributions are limited to these fields.

 

Shah challenged preconceived notions and popular beliefs about the family in India. To begin with, he criticised the indiscriminate use of the term 'family' and the tendency to move imperceptibly from one sense of the word to another. To avoid the confusion thus created, he suggested a necessary distinction between 'household' and 'family', for analytical purposes, and provided definitions for both the terms.

 

In his sustained writings on the family, which culminated in The Household Dimension of the Family in India (Shah 1973), Shah challenged several accepted notions: (i) that, in the past, joint households were commoner than nuclear households, (ii) that there is an inevitable evolutionary shift from the former to the latter, (iii) that joint households are characteristic more of rural rather than urban areas, and (iv) that urbanisation encourages formation of nuclear households. On the basis of historical as well as ethnographic data, he rejected the widespread notion that all villagers in traditional India lived in large and complex households composed of two or more married brothers. In fact, small and simple households were preponderant, and even among the complex ones the large majority was composed of parents and one married son.

 

Shah accepted the idea that there is some pattern in the developmental process of a household, for' example, from simple to complex household and back to simple household following the break up of the complex household. However, this process was not cyclical in nature as conceived by Meyer Fortes and his associates, who believed that domestic groups (or households) passed through a set pattern in their developmental cycle. With convincing data and arguments, he also refuted the popular assumption that people lived in large joint households in pre-British India and that joint households were breaking up because of the impact of industrialisation and urbanisation initiated by British rule.

 

Shah's work on the family received widespread appreciation in the scholarly world in India and abroad. His teacher and lifelong colleague, M. N. Srinivas, said, 'Or Shah's study is a milestone in the sociological analysis of the Indian family' (Srinivas 1973: xi). In a letter to Shah dated 22 January 1966, Louis Dumont said, 'Your study of the family is very useful. I have discussed it in a seminar with my students.' Marc Galanter, a sociologist of law, wrote to him on 17 July 1965, 'Your study of the family is very enlightening'. The eminent historian Tom Kessinger wrote a long review article, praising Shah's work. He said, 'The field is fortunate to have the contribution of A. M. Shah from the outset. An eminent sociologist with keen historical sense, his papers over the past thirteen years and his culminating work, The Household Dimension of the Family in India (1973) have provided for us a set of carefully refined definitions, a sophisticated conceptual framework, and a constructive criticism of preceding work which should guide us around the pitfalls which have plagued the work on the ... family' (Kessinger 1976: 2-8).

 

Shah's contribution to the understanding of caste system is equally original and important. In his Division and Hierarchy co-authored with I. P. Desai (Shah and Desai 1988), who was his teacher and colleague, Shah corrects the tendency among scholars, including Louis Dumont, to overemphasise the principle of hierarchy and to ignore the principle of division. Marshalling ethnographic data on caste from rural as well as urban Gujarat, he highlights these two basic principles governing the caste system. According to him, division (or separation) is as important as hierarchy. Division emphasises a sense of being different and separate rather than being higher or lower. However, there is a tendency in the literature to emphasise hierarchy as the primary principle. Caste in urban areas in particular, however) demonstrates division as the primary principle. Shah's research on caste covered both rural and urban areas unlike most other studies, which were limited to rural areas. He therefore pleads for the study of caste in urban areas in order to override the tendency to generalise about caste on the basis of studies in rural areas alone; the latter tendency distorts perception and hinders a balanced view. According to him, at one end, there are castes where the principle of hierarchy has free play and where the role of the principle of division is limited. The Rajputs, Kolis and Bhils in Gujarat are examples of such castes. At the other end, there are castes where the principle of division has free play and where the role of the principle of hierarchy is limited. The Vanias (Banias) of Gujarat are such an example. Dowry and bride price are characteristics of the Rajpurs, Kolis and Bhils, where hierarchy is the primary principle; and their absence is a characteristic of the Vanias, where division is the primary principle. As Srinivas stated, 'Shah rightly points out the failure of scholars to take note of urban caste. Shah tried to fill up this gap'. Srinivas also noted that hah's account of hypergamy in Gujarat is one of the best he had come across (Srinivas 1988: xi-xii).

 

Contents

 

 

Acknowledgements

vii

 

Abbreviations

ix

 

Introduction

1

 

PART 1 GENDER ISSUES

31

1.

Assertive Voices: The Other Side of Burqa

33

2.

Heart Beating with Fear and Eyes Filled with Rosy Dreams: Experiences of Poor Muslim Women in Rural Bangladesh

58

3.

Towards a Conceptual Understanding of Female Infanticide in Modern India

93

 

PART 2 SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION:

129

 

BELIEF, PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES

 

4.

Popular Perceptions of the Role of Catholic Priests

131

5.

Religious Cover for Political Power: Narratives from People and the Vernacular Press on the 2002 Riots in Gujarat

146

6.

This-Wordly Hinduism: A Case Study

172

 

PART 3 DEVELOPMENT AND MODERNISATION

185

7.

Grandmothers Hold the Key to Social Change

187

8.

Cooperatives and Industrialisation in Rural Areas: The Indian Experience

202

9.

Patidars as Metaphor of Indian Diaspora

220

10.

The Socio-Cultural Context of Informed Consent in Medical Practice

257

 

PART 4 DISCIPLINARY CONCERNS

281

11.

Empirical Meaning and Imputed Meaning in the Study of Kinship

283

12.

Gendering Sociological Practice: A Case Study of Teaching in the University

308

13.

Why Are Children's Voices Largley Unheard in Household Ethnographies?

331

 

Epilogue: A. M. Shah-Man and His Work

352

 

Glossary

362

 

Publications of A. M. Shah

364

 

Contributors

371

 

Index

373

 

Sample Pages

















Understanding Indian Society (Past and Present)

Item Code:
NAG490
Cover:
Paperback
Edition:
2012
ISBN:
9788125042648
Language:
English
Size:
8.5 inch X 5.5 inch
Pages:
388
Other Details:
Weight of the Book: 425 gms
Price:
$20.00   Shipping Free
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
Understanding Indian Society (Past and Present)

Verify the characters on the left

From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 1570 times since 21st Apr, 2016

About the Book

 

Understanding Indian Society brings together a collection of writings by eminent scholars across disciplines that capture the dynamic character of Indian society. The fifteen essays focus on four vital areas-gender relations, religion, developmental concerns and social change, and the future of the discipline of sociology.

 

The volume explores a wide range of issues as varied as Muslim women's struggle for independence in a patriarchal society colonial linkages of female foeticide, religious and communal conflicts, dilemmas of practising medical ethics, participation of the Patidar diaspora in the prosperity of the Gujarati Community, among others. Taken together, the collection demonstrates the analytical richness of current scholarship and gives fresh insights into the society of India. Commemorating Professor A.M. Shah's work in the contemporary context, the contributors highlight the major role he played in the growth of sociology as a discipline.

 

The book will be of interest to specialists in gender studies, sociology of family and religion, medical sociology and development studies. It will also appeal to readers interested in the complex structure and practices of Indian society.

 

About the Author

 

B.S. Baviskar is senior Fellow, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi.

 

Tulsi Patel is Professor of Sociology University of Delhi

 

Introduction

 

In an academic career spanning over five decades, Arvindbhai Manilal Shah (born 22 August 1931) totally dedicated himself to teaching, research, and other professional duties. This volume celebrates his varied and valued contributions while he was, at the same time, a teacher, researcher, and professional colleague. It contains fourteen essays on various themes, presented by his students and colleagues, as a modest tribute to him. It ends in an epilogue written by his close friend, N. R. Sheth, about 'the man and his work'.

 

We begin with a brief review of Shah's major contributions to development of sociology and social anthropology in India. His contributions may not be dazzling, but they are solid, original, and fundamental to the growth of the discipline. Given the constraint of space, we concentrate on his contributions to the study of the family, the caste system, Hinduism and its sects, village communities, and historical sociology. This does not mean, however, that his contributions are limited to these fields.

 

Shah challenged preconceived notions and popular beliefs about the family in India. To begin with, he criticised the indiscriminate use of the term 'family' and the tendency to move imperceptibly from one sense of the word to another. To avoid the confusion thus created, he suggested a necessary distinction between 'household' and 'family', for analytical purposes, and provided definitions for both the terms.

 

In his sustained writings on the family, which culminated in The Household Dimension of the Family in India (Shah 1973), Shah challenged several accepted notions: (i) that, in the past, joint households were commoner than nuclear households, (ii) that there is an inevitable evolutionary shift from the former to the latter, (iii) that joint households are characteristic more of rural rather than urban areas, and (iv) that urbanisation encourages formation of nuclear households. On the basis of historical as well as ethnographic data, he rejected the widespread notion that all villagers in traditional India lived in large and complex households composed of two or more married brothers. In fact, small and simple households were preponderant, and even among the complex ones the large majority was composed of parents and one married son.

 

Shah accepted the idea that there is some pattern in the developmental process of a household, for' example, from simple to complex household and back to simple household following the break up of the complex household. However, this process was not cyclical in nature as conceived by Meyer Fortes and his associates, who believed that domestic groups (or households) passed through a set pattern in their developmental cycle. With convincing data and arguments, he also refuted the popular assumption that people lived in large joint households in pre-British India and that joint households were breaking up because of the impact of industrialisation and urbanisation initiated by British rule.

 

Shah's work on the family received widespread appreciation in the scholarly world in India and abroad. His teacher and lifelong colleague, M. N. Srinivas, said, 'Or Shah's study is a milestone in the sociological analysis of the Indian family' (Srinivas 1973: xi). In a letter to Shah dated 22 January 1966, Louis Dumont said, 'Your study of the family is very useful. I have discussed it in a seminar with my students.' Marc Galanter, a sociologist of law, wrote to him on 17 July 1965, 'Your study of the family is very enlightening'. The eminent historian Tom Kessinger wrote a long review article, praising Shah's work. He said, 'The field is fortunate to have the contribution of A. M. Shah from the outset. An eminent sociologist with keen historical sense, his papers over the past thirteen years and his culminating work, The Household Dimension of the Family in India (1973) have provided for us a set of carefully refined definitions, a sophisticated conceptual framework, and a constructive criticism of preceding work which should guide us around the pitfalls which have plagued the work on the ... family' (Kessinger 1976: 2-8).

 

Shah's contribution to the understanding of caste system is equally original and important. In his Division and Hierarchy co-authored with I. P. Desai (Shah and Desai 1988), who was his teacher and colleague, Shah corrects the tendency among scholars, including Louis Dumont, to overemphasise the principle of hierarchy and to ignore the principle of division. Marshalling ethnographic data on caste from rural as well as urban Gujarat, he highlights these two basic principles governing the caste system. According to him, division (or separation) is as important as hierarchy. Division emphasises a sense of being different and separate rather than being higher or lower. However, there is a tendency in the literature to emphasise hierarchy as the primary principle. Caste in urban areas in particular, however) demonstrates division as the primary principle. Shah's research on caste covered both rural and urban areas unlike most other studies, which were limited to rural areas. He therefore pleads for the study of caste in urban areas in order to override the tendency to generalise about caste on the basis of studies in rural areas alone; the latter tendency distorts perception and hinders a balanced view. According to him, at one end, there are castes where the principle of hierarchy has free play and where the role of the principle of division is limited. The Rajputs, Kolis and Bhils in Gujarat are examples of such castes. At the other end, there are castes where the principle of division has free play and where the role of the principle of hierarchy is limited. The Vanias (Banias) of Gujarat are such an example. Dowry and bride price are characteristics of the Rajpurs, Kolis and Bhils, where hierarchy is the primary principle; and their absence is a characteristic of the Vanias, where division is the primary principle. As Srinivas stated, 'Shah rightly points out the failure of scholars to take note of urban caste. Shah tried to fill up this gap'. Srinivas also noted that hah's account of hypergamy in Gujarat is one of the best he had come across (Srinivas 1988: xi-xii).

 

Contents

 

 

Acknowledgements

vii

 

Abbreviations

ix

 

Introduction

1

 

PART 1 GENDER ISSUES

31

1.

Assertive Voices: The Other Side of Burqa

33

2.

Heart Beating with Fear and Eyes Filled with Rosy Dreams: Experiences of Poor Muslim Women in Rural Bangladesh

58

3.

Towards a Conceptual Understanding of Female Infanticide in Modern India

93

 

PART 2 SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION:

129

 

BELIEF, PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES

 

4.

Popular Perceptions of the Role of Catholic Priests

131

5.

Religious Cover for Political Power: Narratives from People and the Vernacular Press on the 2002 Riots in Gujarat

146

6.

This-Wordly Hinduism: A Case Study

172

 

PART 3 DEVELOPMENT AND MODERNISATION

185

7.

Grandmothers Hold the Key to Social Change

187

8.

Cooperatives and Industrialisation in Rural Areas: The Indian Experience

202

9.

Patidars as Metaphor of Indian Diaspora

220

10.

The Socio-Cultural Context of Informed Consent in Medical Practice

257

 

PART 4 DISCIPLINARY CONCERNS

281

11.

Empirical Meaning and Imputed Meaning in the Study of Kinship

283

12.

Gendering Sociological Practice: A Case Study of Teaching in the University

308

13.

Why Are Children's Voices Largley Unheard in Household Ethnographies?

331

 

Epilogue: A. M. Shah-Man and His Work

352

 

Glossary

362

 

Publications of A. M. Shah

364

 

Contributors

371

 

Index

373

 

Sample Pages

















Post a Comment
 
Post Review
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy

Related Items

South Indian Society in Transition (Ancient to Medieval)
by Noboru Karashima
Hardcover (Edition: 2009)
Oxford university Press
Item Code: NAL713
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Early Indian Feudal Society and Its Culture
Item Code: NAK617
$40.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
INDIAN SOCIETY
by S.C. DUBE
Paperback (Edition: 2001)
National Book Trust, India
Item Code: IDD665
$13.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Early Medieval Indian Society: A Study in Feudalisation
by R S Sharma
Paperback (Edition: 2009)
Orient Blackswan Pvt. Ltd.
Item Code: NAH270
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Rethinking Radicalism in Indian Society (Bhagat Singh and Beyond)
by Jose George and Manoj Kumar
Hardcover (Edition: 2009)
Rawat Publications
Item Code: NAH012
$45.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The City In Indian History (Urban Demography, Society and Politics)
by Indu Banga
Paperback (Edition: 2005)
Manohar Publishers and Distributors
Item Code: NAF740
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The 1857 Rebellion (Debates in Indian History and Society)
by Biswamoy Pati
Paperback (Edition: 2011)
Oxford University Press
Item Code: NAF269
$35.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Self, Society and Value: Reflections on Indian Philosophical Thought
by Shashiprabha Kumar
Hardcover (Edition: 2005)
Vidyanidhi Prakashan, Delhi
Item Code: IDI125
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now

Testimonials

The Lakshmi statue arrived today and it is beautiful. Thank you so much for all of your help. I am thrilled and she is an amazing statue for my living room.
Susanna, West Hollywood, CA.
I received my ordered items in good condition. I appreciate your excellent service that includes a very good collection of items and prompt delivery service arrangements upon receiving the order.
Ram, USA
Adishankaracharya arrived safely in Munich. You all did a great job. The packaging was extraordinary well done. Thanks to all of you. I´m very happy...
Hermann, Germany
We had placed the order on your site and we received it today. We had tried a lot for finding that book but we couldn't. Thanks for the book.This was what we wanted.
Harkaran
I received my items in good condition. Packing was excellent. I appreciate your excellent service that includes a very good array of items you offer, various good shipping options, and prompt response upon receiving the order.
Ram
I received the necklace today. It is absolutely beautiful -so amazing. And the beautiful box it came in. Thank you so much for this amazing art. Very best regards.
Clare, Ireland
I received a dupatta with a Warli print. It is so beautiful! Great price.
Marie, USA
I just got the package delivered. The books look in good condition from outside. Thanks again. It is always a pleasure doing business with you.
Shambhu, Brooklyn
I wanted to let you know that the books arrived yesterday in excellent condition. Many, many thanks for the very rapid response. My husband had purchased many years ago a Kâshî Sanskrit Series edition of Nâgesha’s work that lacked the second volume. Delighted to have found the entire work — and in the original edition.
Cheryl, Portland.
I received a sterling silver cuff and ring. Both are more beautiful than I imagined. They came in a beautiful box; I will treasure them. The items here are made by artists.. and the shipping was faster than I expected.
Marie, USA
TRUSTe
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2017 © Exotic India