Secondly, the entire region is full of archaeological sites from the lower Paleolithic stage onwards, and some of the
major issues of cultural development in eastern India are centred around them.
Thirdly, the plateau which is rich in metals, stones and timber is the most important resource-bearing area in east
India, and the way in which it was integrated into an exchange network with the plains may be a major archaeological and
historical theme of study.
Fourthly, the region as a whole is the home of a large number of tribal communities on various levels of
subsistence and with different linguistic affiliations. Early this century a government officer wrote that it was as near as
one could get to 'primitive India' but does this 'primitiveness' mean that this was an 'area of isolation' cut off from the main
flow of Indian history? Which areas of study admit of the possibilities of ethnographic continuum between the prehistoric
past and the preindustrial present in this region?
"Based on field-surveys undertaken between 1981 and 1987, this work studies the archaeology of this region as a whole.
Archaeological research in this region goes back to the 1860s but it is perhaps for the first time that the region as a whole has
been studied and the various dimensions of its archaeology focussed. This is also one of the major attempts to view
archaeology as long-term settlement history in the context of India."
Preface.1. Introduction. 2. Palamau. 3. Hazaribagh and
Giridih. 4. Ranchi. 5. Singhbhum. 6. Santal parganas. 7. Purulia.
8. Bankura. 9. Burdwan. 10. Midnapur. 11. Birbhum. 12. Summary
and conclusions. References. Index.
Your email address will not be published *
Send as free online greeting card
Email a Friend