There is a hardly any period in Indian history that has engaged so much attention of scholars as the Gupta age and yet, what is known about it is not free from inaccuracy, inadequacy and controversy. The period still tempts scholars to fresh enquiries into the realm of the unknown and reevaluation of the known. It is with this two-fold object of unfolding a broader vision of history and reassessing the accumulated knowledge in a proper perspective that an objective enquiry into this 'classical' phase of Indian history has been ventured upon.
A task like this is beset with problems of great magnitude. The field, treaded upon, has already been traversed by the 'giant' historians of the present and preceding centuries. The data, whether archaeological or literary, are inadequate and vague, and, more often than not, dubious and contrary in nature. These not-too-satisfactory data are further too widely scattered to be studied in their originals even by a widely traveled investigator. Moreover, there remains the constant danger of being swayed by the infatuating professed idealism in the assessment of a historical phenomenon and deduction of a generalization to the detriment of an objective or rational approach.
The present work embodies the author's investigation, carried on strictly in consonance with the aforesaid aims and objectives, into six puzzling problems of the history of the Imperial Guptas, including the homeland of the imperial Guptas, Gupta-Licchavi entente cordiale, Kacha issue, genealogy and chronology of the Later Imperial Guptas, disintegration of the Gupta empire and agrarian relations.
In writing this monograph the author, more often than not, was overwhelmed with joy to see how deeply he owed his gratitude to his illustrious teachers like Professor D.C. Sircar, Professor N.N. Das Gupta, Professor B.C. Sen and Professor S. Chattopadhyaya who kindly taught him the lessons of Indian history. Alas! None of these revered scholars is with us at present to appreciate the merit of the work, if there be any, or to point out its limitations, which, I am sure, are quite numerous. To Professor R.S. Sharma he is indebted for the stimuli his learned writings evoke. The author is sincerely thankful to Shri Shakti Malik for the interest he has taken in publishing this work. He is, likewise, thankful to his wife Malabika, daughter Paramita and son Dipankar for their forbearance in keeping him at bay from the worries of a practical householder.
There is hardly any period in Indian history that has engaged so much attention of scholars as the Gupta age and yet, what is known about it is not free from inaccuracy, inadequacy and controversy. The period still tempts scholars to fresh enquiries into the realm of the unknown and re-evaluation of the known. It is with this two-fold object of unfolding a broader vision of history and reassessing the accumulated knowledge in a proper perspective that an objective enquiry into this 'Classical' phase of Indian history has been ventured upon.
A task like this is beset with problems of great magnitude. The field, treaded upon, has already been traversed by the 'giant' historians of the present and preceding centuries. The data, whether archaeological or literary, are inadequate and vague, and, more often than not, dubious and contrary in nature. These not-too-satisfactory data are further too widely scattered to be studied in their originals even by a widely traveled investigator. Moreover, there remains the constant danger of being swayed by the infatuating professed idealism in the assessment of a historical phenomenon and deduction of generalization to the detriment of an objective or rational approach.
The present work embodies the author's investigations, carried on strictly in consonance with the aforesaid aims and objectives, into six puzzling problems of the history of the imperial Guptas, including the homeland of the imperial Guptas, Gupta-Licchavi entente cordiale, Kacha issue, genealogy and chronology of the Later Imperial Guptas, disintegration of the Gupta empire and agrarian relations.
Dilip Kumar Ganguly, born in 1939 at Kirtipasha in Barisal district, now in Bangladesh, took Master's degree from Calcutta University, standing first in Class I in order of merit. He joined Visva-Bharati University as a Lecturer in the Department of Ancient Indian History, Culture and Archaeology in 1963. He took his doctorate from the same University in 1970, and the same year he was awarded the Premchand Raychand Scholarship of Calcutta University. He was subsequently awarded the Most Medal for his researches on ancient Indian administration. He was appointed Reader in Visva-Bharati University in 1979 and nominated Visiting Professor in Sambalpur University, Orissa, in 1986.
Among his important publications are: The Historical Geography and Dynastic History of Orissa (Calcutta, 1975), Aspect of Ancient Indian Administration (New Delhi, 1979) and History and Historians in Ancient India (New Delhi, 1984).
Introduction | xi | |
1. | THE HOMELAND OF THE IMPERIAL GUPTAS | 1-25 |
1. | The statement of the problem | 1 |
2. | The Puranic Account | 1 |
3. | The Analysis of the Puranic Account | 2 |
4. | Findings of the Puranic Account | 5 |
5. | Some Controversial Passages and their Interpretation | 5 |
6. | The Account of the Bhavisyottara Purana | 6 |
7. | The Testimony of Kau-fa-kau-sang-chuen | 7 |
8. | Identification of Che-li-ki-to | 7 |
9. | Conflicting Translations and Interpretations | 9 |
10. | Corroborative Value of the Taisho Edition | 11 |
11. | Location of the China Temple | 11 |
12. | Reconciliation between the Puranic and Chinese Account | 12 |
13. | Formulation of the Working Hypothesis | 12 |
14. | The Theory of the Allahabad Origin of the Gupta Kingdom | 13 |
15. | The Theory of the Mathura-Ayodhya Homeland | 17 |
16. | Conducive Geographical Factors | 19 |
II. | THE GUPTA-LICCHAVI ENTENTE CORDIALE | 26-51 |
1. | The statement of the Problem | 26 |
2. | Different Categories of Data and their Evaluation | 26 |
3. | Contributory Factors to the Formation of the Gupta-Licchavi Entente | 28 |
4. | Nature, Tenure and Effects of the Alliance | 31 |
5. | Candragupta I-Kumaradevi Coins and the Question of their Attribution | 36 |
6. | Interpretation of the Obverse device | 46 |
7. | Identity of the Goddess on the Reverse | 48 |
III. | THE KACA PROBLEM | 52-73 |
1. | The Statement of the Problem | 52 |
2. | Description of Coins | 52 |
3. | M.J. Sharma on the Attribution of the Kaca Coins | 53 |
4. | Theory of Kaca's Identity with Ramagupta | 54 |
5. | View Equating Kaca with Ghatotkaca | 56 |
6. | Kaca and Samudragupta Identified | 57 |
7. | Kaca Identified with a Rebel Brother of Samudragupta | 61 |
8. | Commemoration Theory of R.D. Banerji | 66 |
9. | Kaca Identified with an Interloper | 66 |
10. | Conclusion | 67 |
IV. | GENEALOGY AND CHRONOLOGY OF THE LATER IMPERIAL GUPTAS | 74-107 |
1. | Skandagupta and Purugupta | 74 |
2. | Kumaragupta of the Sarnath Inscription | 82 |
3. | Identity of Prakasaditya | 89 |
4. | Budhagupta | 92 |
5. | Vainyagupta | 94 |
6. | Bhanugupta | 97 |
7. | Narasimhagupta | 98 |
8. | Kumaragupta III | 100 |
9. | Visnugupta | 100 |
10. | The Question of the Existence of Candragupta III | 101 |
V. | THE DISINTEGRATION OF THE GUPTA EMPIRE | 108-135 |
1. | The Statement of the Problem | 108 |
2. | The Gupta Kingdom from C. A.D. 450 to C. A.D. 467 | 108 |
3. | Emergence of Independent States in Gujarat and Malwa | 112 |
4. | Ascendancy of New Powers in the West | 113 |
5. | Huna Menace | 116 |
6. | Rise of Yasodharman | 119 |
7. | Emergence of the Maukharis and the Later Guptas | 121 |
8. | The last Phase of Gupta Rule | 122 |
9. | The Causes of the Decline of the Gupta Kingdom | 124 |
VI. | AGRARIAN RELATIONS IN THE GUPTA KINGDOM | 136-168 |
1. | Ownership of Land | 136 |
2. | Royal Prerogative Rights | 147 |
3. | Land Revenue Officials | 152 |
4. | The Crown Land | 152 |
5. | The Brahmin Landholders | 153 |
6. | Other Landowning Communities | 156 |
7. | Sharecroppers and Agricultural Labourers | 156 |
8. | Agricultural Slaves | 158 |
9. | Revenue-Payee Royal Officials | 159 |
10. | Absence of Large Farmers | 160 |
11. | Conclusions | 160 |
Bibliography | 169 | |
Index | 181 |
There is a hardly any period in Indian history that has engaged so much attention of scholars as the Gupta age and yet, what is known about it is not free from inaccuracy, inadequacy and controversy. The period still tempts scholars to fresh enquiries into the realm of the unknown and reevaluation of the known. It is with this two-fold object of unfolding a broader vision of history and reassessing the accumulated knowledge in a proper perspective that an objective enquiry into this 'classical' phase of Indian history has been ventured upon.
A task like this is beset with problems of great magnitude. The field, treaded upon, has already been traversed by the 'giant' historians of the present and preceding centuries. The data, whether archaeological or literary, are inadequate and vague, and, more often than not, dubious and contrary in nature. These not-too-satisfactory data are further too widely scattered to be studied in their originals even by a widely traveled investigator. Moreover, there remains the constant danger of being swayed by the infatuating professed idealism in the assessment of a historical phenomenon and deduction of a generalization to the detriment of an objective or rational approach.
The present work embodies the author's investigation, carried on strictly in consonance with the aforesaid aims and objectives, into six puzzling problems of the history of the Imperial Guptas, including the homeland of the imperial Guptas, Gupta-Licchavi entente cordiale, Kacha issue, genealogy and chronology of the Later Imperial Guptas, disintegration of the Gupta empire and agrarian relations.
In writing this monograph the author, more often than not, was overwhelmed with joy to see how deeply he owed his gratitude to his illustrious teachers like Professor D.C. Sircar, Professor N.N. Das Gupta, Professor B.C. Sen and Professor S. Chattopadhyaya who kindly taught him the lessons of Indian history. Alas! None of these revered scholars is with us at present to appreciate the merit of the work, if there be any, or to point out its limitations, which, I am sure, are quite numerous. To Professor R.S. Sharma he is indebted for the stimuli his learned writings evoke. The author is sincerely thankful to Shri Shakti Malik for the interest he has taken in publishing this work. He is, likewise, thankful to his wife Malabika, daughter Paramita and son Dipankar for their forbearance in keeping him at bay from the worries of a practical householder.
There is hardly any period in Indian history that has engaged so much attention of scholars as the Gupta age and yet, what is known about it is not free from inaccuracy, inadequacy and controversy. The period still tempts scholars to fresh enquiries into the realm of the unknown and re-evaluation of the known. It is with this two-fold object of unfolding a broader vision of history and reassessing the accumulated knowledge in a proper perspective that an objective enquiry into this 'Classical' phase of Indian history has been ventured upon.
A task like this is beset with problems of great magnitude. The field, treaded upon, has already been traversed by the 'giant' historians of the present and preceding centuries. The data, whether archaeological or literary, are inadequate and vague, and, more often than not, dubious and contrary in nature. These not-too-satisfactory data are further too widely scattered to be studied in their originals even by a widely traveled investigator. Moreover, there remains the constant danger of being swayed by the infatuating professed idealism in the assessment of a historical phenomenon and deduction of generalization to the detriment of an objective or rational approach.
The present work embodies the author's investigations, carried on strictly in consonance with the aforesaid aims and objectives, into six puzzling problems of the history of the imperial Guptas, including the homeland of the imperial Guptas, Gupta-Licchavi entente cordiale, Kacha issue, genealogy and chronology of the Later Imperial Guptas, disintegration of the Gupta empire and agrarian relations.
Dilip Kumar Ganguly, born in 1939 at Kirtipasha in Barisal district, now in Bangladesh, took Master's degree from Calcutta University, standing first in Class I in order of merit. He joined Visva-Bharati University as a Lecturer in the Department of Ancient Indian History, Culture and Archaeology in 1963. He took his doctorate from the same University in 1970, and the same year he was awarded the Premchand Raychand Scholarship of Calcutta University. He was subsequently awarded the Most Medal for his researches on ancient Indian administration. He was appointed Reader in Visva-Bharati University in 1979 and nominated Visiting Professor in Sambalpur University, Orissa, in 1986.
Among his important publications are: The Historical Geography and Dynastic History of Orissa (Calcutta, 1975), Aspect of Ancient Indian Administration (New Delhi, 1979) and History and Historians in Ancient India (New Delhi, 1984).
Introduction | xi | |
1. | THE HOMELAND OF THE IMPERIAL GUPTAS | 1-25 |
1. | The statement of the problem | 1 |
2. | The Puranic Account | 1 |
3. | The Analysis of the Puranic Account | 2 |
4. | Findings of the Puranic Account | 5 |
5. | Some Controversial Passages and their Interpretation | 5 |
6. | The Account of the Bhavisyottara Purana | 6 |
7. | The Testimony of Kau-fa-kau-sang-chuen | 7 |
8. | Identification of Che-li-ki-to | 7 |
9. | Conflicting Translations and Interpretations | 9 |
10. | Corroborative Value of the Taisho Edition | 11 |
11. | Location of the China Temple | 11 |
12. | Reconciliation between the Puranic and Chinese Account | 12 |
13. | Formulation of the Working Hypothesis | 12 |
14. | The Theory of the Allahabad Origin of the Gupta Kingdom | 13 |
15. | The Theory of the Mathura-Ayodhya Homeland | 17 |
16. | Conducive Geographical Factors | 19 |
II. | THE GUPTA-LICCHAVI ENTENTE CORDIALE | 26-51 |
1. | The statement of the Problem | 26 |
2. | Different Categories of Data and their Evaluation | 26 |
3. | Contributory Factors to the Formation of the Gupta-Licchavi Entente | 28 |
4. | Nature, Tenure and Effects of the Alliance | 31 |
5. | Candragupta I-Kumaradevi Coins and the Question of their Attribution | 36 |
6. | Interpretation of the Obverse device | 46 |
7. | Identity of the Goddess on the Reverse | 48 |
III. | THE KACA PROBLEM | 52-73 |
1. | The Statement of the Problem | 52 |
2. | Description of Coins | 52 |
3. | M.J. Sharma on the Attribution of the Kaca Coins | 53 |
4. | Theory of Kaca's Identity with Ramagupta | 54 |
5. | View Equating Kaca with Ghatotkaca | 56 |
6. | Kaca and Samudragupta Identified | 57 |
7. | Kaca Identified with a Rebel Brother of Samudragupta | 61 |
8. | Commemoration Theory of R.D. Banerji | 66 |
9. | Kaca Identified with an Interloper | 66 |
10. | Conclusion | 67 |
IV. | GENEALOGY AND CHRONOLOGY OF THE LATER IMPERIAL GUPTAS | 74-107 |
1. | Skandagupta and Purugupta | 74 |
2. | Kumaragupta of the Sarnath Inscription | 82 |
3. | Identity of Prakasaditya | 89 |
4. | Budhagupta | 92 |
5. | Vainyagupta | 94 |
6. | Bhanugupta | 97 |
7. | Narasimhagupta | 98 |
8. | Kumaragupta III | 100 |
9. | Visnugupta | 100 |
10. | The Question of the Existence of Candragupta III | 101 |
V. | THE DISINTEGRATION OF THE GUPTA EMPIRE | 108-135 |
1. | The Statement of the Problem | 108 |
2. | The Gupta Kingdom from C. A.D. 450 to C. A.D. 467 | 108 |
3. | Emergence of Independent States in Gujarat and Malwa | 112 |
4. | Ascendancy of New Powers in the West | 113 |
5. | Huna Menace | 116 |
6. | Rise of Yasodharman | 119 |
7. | Emergence of the Maukharis and the Later Guptas | 121 |
8. | The last Phase of Gupta Rule | 122 |
9. | The Causes of the Decline of the Gupta Kingdom | 124 |
VI. | AGRARIAN RELATIONS IN THE GUPTA KINGDOM | 136-168 |
1. | Ownership of Land | 136 |
2. | Royal Prerogative Rights | 147 |
3. | Land Revenue Officials | 152 |
4. | The Crown Land | 152 |
5. | The Brahmin Landholders | 153 |
6. | Other Landowning Communities | 156 |
7. | Sharecroppers and Agricultural Labourers | 156 |
8. | Agricultural Slaves | 158 |
9. | Revenue-Payee Royal Officials | 159 |
10. | Absence of Large Farmers | 160 |
11. | Conclusions | 160 |
Bibliography | 169 | |
Index | 181 |