Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address info@exoticindia.com.

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Your Cart (0)
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > History > The Holocaust of Indian Partition
Displaying 577 of 4966         Previous  |  NextSubscribe to our newsletter and discounts
The Holocaust of Indian Partition
Pages from the book
The Holocaust of Indian Partition
Look Inside the Book
Description
Back of the Book

The partition of India was a traumatic event. Apart from destroying the unity of India, the two-nation theory created a divide between the Muslims and non-Muslims which has not been easy to bridge. But, more important was its tremendous human cost-loss of about a million lives and uprooting of nearly eighteen million people. This holocaust, which Nehru described as a man-made Greek tragedy, is the focus of this book. Based on extensive and in-depth research, it sheds new light on several important issues.

The book surveys the critical eighteen-month period preceding the transfer of power which saw widespread communal hatred and violence. The poison of communalism had seeped so deep that it should have been evident to anyone that transfer of power was not going to be peaceful. But, the British and the leaders of the two would-be dominions-India and Pakistan-failed to see this writing on the wall. The book vividly brings out the holocaust, makes a clinical and thorough inquest, and concludes that, with foresight and planning, its extent and severity could have been reduced substantially.

Analysis of such a monumental tragedy inevitably leads to a critical appraisal of the role played by the authors of the tragedy, and the actors who played a part in it-on stage, backstage and in the wings.

The book argues that Nehru and Patel must have been aware of the seriousness of Jinnah's illness and still pressed for partition. India, which is better off with partition, should be eternally indebted to them for their farsightedness, political courage and statesmanship. United India would have been unliveable, ungovernable, unsurvivable. With its wide canvas, this fascinating and thought-provoking book is a must read.

About the Author

Madhav Godbole (b. 1936) has a M.A. in development economics and M.A. and PhD in economics (University of Bombay). He joined the Indian Administrative Service in 1959 and resigned as Union Home Secretary. He has been secretary, Urban Development, and secretary, Petroleum and Natural Gas in Government of India, Principle Finance secretary, and chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Board in Government of Maharashtra. He worked in the Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philoppines, from 1980-85.

He has written eleven books in English and Marathi. He has co-authored the working paper, A Quest for Good Governance based on his public interest litigation in the Supreme Court. He also writes on current issues in newspapers and reputed journals.

After retirement, he worked as chairman of several Committees: state level economic reforms, co-operative sugar factories, Enron Power Project, power Sector reforms, amongst others.

He is the recipient of chinmulgund Public administration Award and Dr. M. Visvesvarayya Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award.

Preface

The machinations, political strategies, confabulations and processes which led to the Partition of India have fascinated me for a long time. But, more than the partition itself, what captivated me was the colossal human tragedy which was the traumatic and inevitable culmination of the partition. It showed how millions of common, innocent persons, far removed from politics, became mere pawns in the hands of apparently larger-than-life Indian politicians and the British who were in authority, in their games of one-up-manship. After the lapse of nearly six decades, it is time to take an objective, clinical and apolitical view of this horrendous and gruesome chapter in the history of the Indian sub-continent. When most of the main actors in this "manmade Greek tragedy", as Nehru described it, have departed from the scene, an effort must be made to take a more detached view, untainted by narrow preferences, personal and political loyalties, and national and cultural prejudices and biases pertaining to those who wrote the tragedy and directed it. It is also imperative to introspect on the lessons of partition and ponder on the future course of action and the ormidable challenges ahead. It has taken me more than three years to research, reflect on and write this book. It is with a great sense of humility and an acute awareness of my limitations and shortcomings in working on such a large canvas that, with some trepidation, I am placing the book in the hands of the readers.

I am thankful to my former colleagues, Satish Chandra, a well- known diplomat, and K.M. Ahmad, who is now a busy attorney in New York, for having spared time, from their busy schedules and numerous other commitments, to go through the manuscript and make valuable suggestions. My wife Sujata and daughter Meera Krishnamurthy have always been diligent readers and critics of all my writings. I am thankful to them for their helpful comments. However, I am alone responsible for any gaps and deficiencies which may have remained.

I would like to place on record my grateful thanks to Sir Ratan Tata Trust for part-funding the research for this book and Govinda Rao, director, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi, for administering the research grant through his institute. I am thankful to Jaya Ravindran and A. Roy, archivists in the National Achieves of India, N. Balakrishnan of the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, Dyaneshwar Bagade of the Arthabodh Institute in Pune, and Dev Raj for their help. I am beholden to Sanjana Roy Choudhury for editing the book so diligently and paying close attention to its flawless production. I must also place on record my grateful thanks to my publisher for bringing out the book so expeditiously. Finally, this book would not have tome to fruition without the support, encouragement and patience of my wife Sujata. I am indebted to her, as always.

Introduction

There are people, in India and abroad, who assert that India got her freedom too cheaply and did not really have to sacrifice much for it. It is unfortunate that this perception has continued all these years in spite of the sacrifices made by millions of people in the freedom struggle which was largely carried out in a peaceful, non-violent manner. Jawaharlal Nehru himself spent as many as 3,262 days, i.e. nearly nine years in jail. It was on 13 April 1919 that Brigadier General Dyer opened fire on 20,000 unarmed and defenceless men, women and children in Jallianwala Bagh which led to the brutal massacre of thousands. Hundreds of thousands died in communal conflagrations all over the country in the period preceding the partition. Death penalty imposed on valiant freedom fighters, the torture and suffering of freedom fighters in jails not just in India but also in Burma (now Myanmar), and the inhuman conditions in which freedom fighters such as Sawarkar were incarcerated and tormented in the Cellular jail in Andaman have been forgotten by ungrateful people. But the biggest price for independence was paid during the partition of India in August 1947 when over a million people died (estimates vary from as low as 200,000 to two million) and nearly eighteen million were uprooted from their homes and hearths and became refugees. As the well known writer Krishna Sobti, who himself became a refugee, put it so aptly, partition is difficult to forget but is dangerous to remember. The atrocities which accompanied this migration, the largest in human history, were unbelievable. The atrocities against defenceless women and children were particularly shocking. All human values were debased and trampled. There was no difference left between human beings and animals. The anger and frustration of the displaced persons was so palpable and frightening that it was sheer wonder that no harm came to Gandhi (even earlier than it did) and Nehru. As Collins and Lapierre have brought out, a wealthy refugee, who had only Rs 500,000 left and felt wiped out and ruined, wanted to donate every pie of that money "to having Nehru and Gandhi killed".

On 22 June 1947, even before the partition massacres and large- scale migration had begun, Nehru wrote to Mountbatten regarding happenings in Lahore and Amritsar. Nehru wrote, "Horror succeeds horror and we cannot put a stop to it .... Human beings have an amazing capacity to endure misfortune. They can bear calamity after calamity; but it is very difficult to have to bear something which can apparently be avoided. I do not know if it can be said that what is happening in Lahore is beyond human control. You gave an assurance even before 3rd June and subsequently that any kind of disorder will be put down with vigour. I am afraid we are not honouring that assurance in some places at least, notably in Lahore and Amritsar. Gurgaon also is still more or less a battlefield."? (Emphasis added).

Though impending civil war was the common refrain all over the country and though it figured again and again in official correspondence and assessment, no one has owned responsibility for the monumental carnage and every one, who was involved in the decision-making processes and affairs of the state during the crucial period, has tried to safeguard his position in history by shifting the blame to someone else or to attribute it to reasons beyond the control of anyone and therefore unavoidable. These are the issues which are addressed in this book. Was the huge human cost paid during the partition unavoidable? Was the strategy for transfer of power flawed? Could the underlying issues have been addressed any differently?

The findings in the book are based on research of the primary and secondary sources of data. The primary sources comprised the government records for the relevant period preserved in the National Archives of India (NAI) and made open to public, oral history transcripts, and the invaluable volumes published by the British government titled The Transfer of Power 1942-47 (TOP).4 Mountbatten's extensive interviews given from time to time as also his writings have been another important source, as are the writings of a number of British and Indian officials and others who served in India during the period. Attention may be invited in this context to the observations made in 1978 by Listowel, who was secretary of state for India in 1947, when the British Cabinet papers of the partition period became available: I do not think that anyone who has tried to follow the accounts published in this country of the transfer of power could fail to be struck by the fact that they have almost all emanated from authors who had earlier served in the government of India, or in the entourage of Lord Mountbatten, or had derived their information from his writings and recollections.

Hugh Tinker has rightly stated, 'We still await a version of the events of 1945-47 which will describe what happened from within the Congress-and within the Muslim League. So far we see everything through British, official eyes."? For example, H.V Hodson, who held the post of constitutional advisor to the viceroy in 1941-42 and was editor of The Sunday Times from 1950 to 1961 has observed in his book The Great Divide, "I am conscious that the sources and the outlook are predominantly British, though Britain was only one party among two or three to the events recorded. But, I reflect that every historian, however impartial and careful of the truth, as I have tried to be, must have a personal point of view, without which history is anaemic, and my viewpoint cannot but be British; and that only an Indian or a Pakistani could write from the viewpoint of his own people and leaders.'? One can join issues, particularly with the latter part of the statement that only an Indian or a Pakistani could write from the point of view of his own people and leaders. This does not have to be necessarily so. A true seeker of truth should be able to get over narrow national and cultural prejudices. A number of British writers such as Leonard Mosley, Richard Hough and others have not only not praised the role of Mountbatten but have also been critical of him. But, Mountbatten agreed with "every word that Hodson has written" and has quoted him extensively again and again in his correspondence with S. Hashim Raza. Commissioned history has its serious pitfalls. It must not be forgotten that history's tests are harsh and inescapable. As Collins and Lapierre have rightly stated, "History has a way of providing, not answers, but ever more troubling questions."?

Considerable government records of the period in India have still not been released. The government of India (Gal), which believes in far too much secrecy, even as compared to the British government, has still not transferred considerable record of the period to the NAI. My letters to the Union Home secretary, followed by reminders, in this regard remained unreplied. The Index to the Proceedings of the Home Department, Political Section, for the years 1946 and 1947 (which incidentally is marked confidential) contains the list of a large number of files. However, only a few of these have been transferred to NAI. It is not known whether the other files are still in the Ministry of Home Affairs (M HA) or have been destroyed. It is high time their status is made clear. Several files of Home Department and other concerned departments which are preserved in NAI pertain to establishment matters of the period such as appointment of persons, their leave, provident fund, retirement etc. which ought to have been weeded out long ago. Policy files, Intelligence Bureau (IB) records and Cabinet papers are not available though nearly six decades have elapsed since independence. Certain files have only the noting portion and no correspondence section at all. From the beginning of 1947, Monthly Summaries of important events sent to the Cabinet are not available for perusal. These summaries as also the Cabinet notes seem to have been removed by MHA before sending the files to the Archives.? In so far as the Ministry of Railways, which played such a crucial role in transporting refugees, is concerned, practically no worthwhile record of the period has been transferred to NAI. The same is true of the Ministry of rehabilitation which was set up in September 1947 and dealt with all matters pertaining to the refugee relief, rehabilitation and resettlement. So far as the Cabinet Secretariat is concerned, the list of files pertaining to partition and related matters for the years 1946- 48 which had been "reviewed, downgraded and transferred" to NAI were just three and these too were quite inconsequential. No files pertaining to 1949 have been transferred to NAI at all. Several files in NAI are in such deplorable condition-with torn, tattered and brittle papers, faded writing and so on-that it is doubtful how long researchers will be able to use them in any meaningful way.

Contents

Prefacexi
Mapsxiii
1Introduction1
2Prelude to Partition- Communal Civil War24
IIntroduction24
IIRapidly Deteriorating Communal Situation25
IIIJinnah's Call for Direct Action32
IVGreat Killing in Calcutta and Riots in East Bengal34
VThe Bihar Riots48
VIIncreasing Arc of Communalism55
VIIPunjab- The Epicentre of Communal Violence59
VIIIToll of Communal Violence80
IXInadequate, Indisciplined and Communalized Police Force83
XRapid Growth of private Armies88
XIArmy- the Main Instrument for Containing Communal Violence91
XIICivil Service in Doldrums92
XIIIUse of force-Legal Implications101
XIVRole of the Press102
XVGeneral Atmosphere in the Country105
3The Holocaust109
IThe 3rd June Announcement109
IIUnending Communal Carnage114
IIIAssurances to Minorities126
IVHell Broke Loose in Independent India and Pakistan134
VBiggest Migration in History178
VIIThe Death Toll214
4The Principal Actors223
IIndian Leaders through the Eyes of the British224
IIMountbatten230
IIIGandhi243
IVNehru253
VJinnah265
VIVallabhbhai Patel269
VIIRelations between Nehru and Patel273
VIIISupporting Actors278
5The Inquest286
IThe Holocaust-Varied Reactions286
IINagging Questions300
1Unwarranted haste in transfer of power300
2There were clear forewarnings of the holocaust311
3Pleas of the Sikhs fell on deaf ears322
4Demands for exchange of populations336
5Empty threats vs. actual use of force349
6Non-arrest of Sikh Leaders358
7Myth of the Punjab Boundary Force363
8Premature withdrawal of British troops and officers377
9Division of the Indian Armed Forces385
10Partition with undecided borders392
11Civil administration in doldrums400
12Political Parties and Communal violence409
13Gandhi's reluctance to visit the Punjab413
14There was no contingency Plan415
IIINo Enquiry, Not Even A Monument425
6The Partition in Retrospect428
IIntroduction428
IIJinnah's illness433
IIIInterim Government with Two Cabinets439
IVCompromises at What Cost?444
VUnpartitioned India: Ungovernable, Unliveable463
VIThe New Beginning476
VIILessons of Partition and Portents496
VIIIIndia will Have to Find its Own Answers543
Appendix IWith a Refugee Column548
Appendix IIRetrospect553
Appendix IIIMountbatten's Self-defence555




















The Holocaust of Indian Partition

Item Code:
NAK223
Cover:
Paperback
Edition:
2011
ISBN:
9788129118127
Language:
English
Size:
8.5 inch X 5.5 inch
Pages:
674 (9 B/W Illustrations)
Other Details:
Weight of the Book: 615 gms
Price:
$35.00   Shipping Free
Look Inside the Book
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
The Holocaust of Indian Partition

Verify the characters on the left

From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 764 times since 16th Jan, 2017
Back of the Book

The partition of India was a traumatic event. Apart from destroying the unity of India, the two-nation theory created a divide between the Muslims and non-Muslims which has not been easy to bridge. But, more important was its tremendous human cost-loss of about a million lives and uprooting of nearly eighteen million people. This holocaust, which Nehru described as a man-made Greek tragedy, is the focus of this book. Based on extensive and in-depth research, it sheds new light on several important issues.

The book surveys the critical eighteen-month period preceding the transfer of power which saw widespread communal hatred and violence. The poison of communalism had seeped so deep that it should have been evident to anyone that transfer of power was not going to be peaceful. But, the British and the leaders of the two would-be dominions-India and Pakistan-failed to see this writing on the wall. The book vividly brings out the holocaust, makes a clinical and thorough inquest, and concludes that, with foresight and planning, its extent and severity could have been reduced substantially.

Analysis of such a monumental tragedy inevitably leads to a critical appraisal of the role played by the authors of the tragedy, and the actors who played a part in it-on stage, backstage and in the wings.

The book argues that Nehru and Patel must have been aware of the seriousness of Jinnah's illness and still pressed for partition. India, which is better off with partition, should be eternally indebted to them for their farsightedness, political courage and statesmanship. United India would have been unliveable, ungovernable, unsurvivable. With its wide canvas, this fascinating and thought-provoking book is a must read.

About the Author

Madhav Godbole (b. 1936) has a M.A. in development economics and M.A. and PhD in economics (University of Bombay). He joined the Indian Administrative Service in 1959 and resigned as Union Home Secretary. He has been secretary, Urban Development, and secretary, Petroleum and Natural Gas in Government of India, Principle Finance secretary, and chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Board in Government of Maharashtra. He worked in the Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philoppines, from 1980-85.

He has written eleven books in English and Marathi. He has co-authored the working paper, A Quest for Good Governance based on his public interest litigation in the Supreme Court. He also writes on current issues in newspapers and reputed journals.

After retirement, he worked as chairman of several Committees: state level economic reforms, co-operative sugar factories, Enron Power Project, power Sector reforms, amongst others.

He is the recipient of chinmulgund Public administration Award and Dr. M. Visvesvarayya Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award.

Preface

The machinations, political strategies, confabulations and processes which led to the Partition of India have fascinated me for a long time. But, more than the partition itself, what captivated me was the colossal human tragedy which was the traumatic and inevitable culmination of the partition. It showed how millions of common, innocent persons, far removed from politics, became mere pawns in the hands of apparently larger-than-life Indian politicians and the British who were in authority, in their games of one-up-manship. After the lapse of nearly six decades, it is time to take an objective, clinical and apolitical view of this horrendous and gruesome chapter in the history of the Indian sub-continent. When most of the main actors in this "manmade Greek tragedy", as Nehru described it, have departed from the scene, an effort must be made to take a more detached view, untainted by narrow preferences, personal and political loyalties, and national and cultural prejudices and biases pertaining to those who wrote the tragedy and directed it. It is also imperative to introspect on the lessons of partition and ponder on the future course of action and the ormidable challenges ahead. It has taken me more than three years to research, reflect on and write this book. It is with a great sense of humility and an acute awareness of my limitations and shortcomings in working on such a large canvas that, with some trepidation, I am placing the book in the hands of the readers.

I am thankful to my former colleagues, Satish Chandra, a well- known diplomat, and K.M. Ahmad, who is now a busy attorney in New York, for having spared time, from their busy schedules and numerous other commitments, to go through the manuscript and make valuable suggestions. My wife Sujata and daughter Meera Krishnamurthy have always been diligent readers and critics of all my writings. I am thankful to them for their helpful comments. However, I am alone responsible for any gaps and deficiencies which may have remained.

I would like to place on record my grateful thanks to Sir Ratan Tata Trust for part-funding the research for this book and Govinda Rao, director, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi, for administering the research grant through his institute. I am thankful to Jaya Ravindran and A. Roy, archivists in the National Achieves of India, N. Balakrishnan of the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, Dyaneshwar Bagade of the Arthabodh Institute in Pune, and Dev Raj for their help. I am beholden to Sanjana Roy Choudhury for editing the book so diligently and paying close attention to its flawless production. I must also place on record my grateful thanks to my publisher for bringing out the book so expeditiously. Finally, this book would not have tome to fruition without the support, encouragement and patience of my wife Sujata. I am indebted to her, as always.

Introduction

There are people, in India and abroad, who assert that India got her freedom too cheaply and did not really have to sacrifice much for it. It is unfortunate that this perception has continued all these years in spite of the sacrifices made by millions of people in the freedom struggle which was largely carried out in a peaceful, non-violent manner. Jawaharlal Nehru himself spent as many as 3,262 days, i.e. nearly nine years in jail. It was on 13 April 1919 that Brigadier General Dyer opened fire on 20,000 unarmed and defenceless men, women and children in Jallianwala Bagh which led to the brutal massacre of thousands. Hundreds of thousands died in communal conflagrations all over the country in the period preceding the partition. Death penalty imposed on valiant freedom fighters, the torture and suffering of freedom fighters in jails not just in India but also in Burma (now Myanmar), and the inhuman conditions in which freedom fighters such as Sawarkar were incarcerated and tormented in the Cellular jail in Andaman have been forgotten by ungrateful people. But the biggest price for independence was paid during the partition of India in August 1947 when over a million people died (estimates vary from as low as 200,000 to two million) and nearly eighteen million were uprooted from their homes and hearths and became refugees. As the well known writer Krishna Sobti, who himself became a refugee, put it so aptly, partition is difficult to forget but is dangerous to remember. The atrocities which accompanied this migration, the largest in human history, were unbelievable. The atrocities against defenceless women and children were particularly shocking. All human values were debased and trampled. There was no difference left between human beings and animals. The anger and frustration of the displaced persons was so palpable and frightening that it was sheer wonder that no harm came to Gandhi (even earlier than it did) and Nehru. As Collins and Lapierre have brought out, a wealthy refugee, who had only Rs 500,000 left and felt wiped out and ruined, wanted to donate every pie of that money "to having Nehru and Gandhi killed".

On 22 June 1947, even before the partition massacres and large- scale migration had begun, Nehru wrote to Mountbatten regarding happenings in Lahore and Amritsar. Nehru wrote, "Horror succeeds horror and we cannot put a stop to it .... Human beings have an amazing capacity to endure misfortune. They can bear calamity after calamity; but it is very difficult to have to bear something which can apparently be avoided. I do not know if it can be said that what is happening in Lahore is beyond human control. You gave an assurance even before 3rd June and subsequently that any kind of disorder will be put down with vigour. I am afraid we are not honouring that assurance in some places at least, notably in Lahore and Amritsar. Gurgaon also is still more or less a battlefield."? (Emphasis added).

Though impending civil war was the common refrain all over the country and though it figured again and again in official correspondence and assessment, no one has owned responsibility for the monumental carnage and every one, who was involved in the decision-making processes and affairs of the state during the crucial period, has tried to safeguard his position in history by shifting the blame to someone else or to attribute it to reasons beyond the control of anyone and therefore unavoidable. These are the issues which are addressed in this book. Was the huge human cost paid during the partition unavoidable? Was the strategy for transfer of power flawed? Could the underlying issues have been addressed any differently?

The findings in the book are based on research of the primary and secondary sources of data. The primary sources comprised the government records for the relevant period preserved in the National Archives of India (NAI) and made open to public, oral history transcripts, and the invaluable volumes published by the British government titled The Transfer of Power 1942-47 (TOP).4 Mountbatten's extensive interviews given from time to time as also his writings have been another important source, as are the writings of a number of British and Indian officials and others who served in India during the period. Attention may be invited in this context to the observations made in 1978 by Listowel, who was secretary of state for India in 1947, when the British Cabinet papers of the partition period became available: I do not think that anyone who has tried to follow the accounts published in this country of the transfer of power could fail to be struck by the fact that they have almost all emanated from authors who had earlier served in the government of India, or in the entourage of Lord Mountbatten, or had derived their information from his writings and recollections.

Hugh Tinker has rightly stated, 'We still await a version of the events of 1945-47 which will describe what happened from within the Congress-and within the Muslim League. So far we see everything through British, official eyes."? For example, H.V Hodson, who held the post of constitutional advisor to the viceroy in 1941-42 and was editor of The Sunday Times from 1950 to 1961 has observed in his book The Great Divide, "I am conscious that the sources and the outlook are predominantly British, though Britain was only one party among two or three to the events recorded. But, I reflect that every historian, however impartial and careful of the truth, as I have tried to be, must have a personal point of view, without which history is anaemic, and my viewpoint cannot but be British; and that only an Indian or a Pakistani could write from the viewpoint of his own people and leaders.'? One can join issues, particularly with the latter part of the statement that only an Indian or a Pakistani could write from the point of view of his own people and leaders. This does not have to be necessarily so. A true seeker of truth should be able to get over narrow national and cultural prejudices. A number of British writers such as Leonard Mosley, Richard Hough and others have not only not praised the role of Mountbatten but have also been critical of him. But, Mountbatten agreed with "every word that Hodson has written" and has quoted him extensively again and again in his correspondence with S. Hashim Raza. Commissioned history has its serious pitfalls. It must not be forgotten that history's tests are harsh and inescapable. As Collins and Lapierre have rightly stated, "History has a way of providing, not answers, but ever more troubling questions."?

Considerable government records of the period in India have still not been released. The government of India (Gal), which believes in far too much secrecy, even as compared to the British government, has still not transferred considerable record of the period to the NAI. My letters to the Union Home secretary, followed by reminders, in this regard remained unreplied. The Index to the Proceedings of the Home Department, Political Section, for the years 1946 and 1947 (which incidentally is marked confidential) contains the list of a large number of files. However, only a few of these have been transferred to NAI. It is not known whether the other files are still in the Ministry of Home Affairs (M HA) or have been destroyed. It is high time their status is made clear. Several files of Home Department and other concerned departments which are preserved in NAI pertain to establishment matters of the period such as appointment of persons, their leave, provident fund, retirement etc. which ought to have been weeded out long ago. Policy files, Intelligence Bureau (IB) records and Cabinet papers are not available though nearly six decades have elapsed since independence. Certain files have only the noting portion and no correspondence section at all. From the beginning of 1947, Monthly Summaries of important events sent to the Cabinet are not available for perusal. These summaries as also the Cabinet notes seem to have been removed by MHA before sending the files to the Archives.? In so far as the Ministry of Railways, which played such a crucial role in transporting refugees, is concerned, practically no worthwhile record of the period has been transferred to NAI. The same is true of the Ministry of rehabilitation which was set up in September 1947 and dealt with all matters pertaining to the refugee relief, rehabilitation and resettlement. So far as the Cabinet Secretariat is concerned, the list of files pertaining to partition and related matters for the years 1946- 48 which had been "reviewed, downgraded and transferred" to NAI were just three and these too were quite inconsequential. No files pertaining to 1949 have been transferred to NAI at all. Several files in NAI are in such deplorable condition-with torn, tattered and brittle papers, faded writing and so on-that it is doubtful how long researchers will be able to use them in any meaningful way.

Contents

Prefacexi
Mapsxiii
1Introduction1
2Prelude to Partition- Communal Civil War24
IIntroduction24
IIRapidly Deteriorating Communal Situation25
IIIJinnah's Call for Direct Action32
IVGreat Killing in Calcutta and Riots in East Bengal34
VThe Bihar Riots48
VIIncreasing Arc of Communalism55
VIIPunjab- The Epicentre of Communal Violence59
VIIIToll of Communal Violence80
IXInadequate, Indisciplined and Communalized Police Force83
XRapid Growth of private Armies88
XIArmy- the Main Instrument for Containing Communal Violence91
XIICivil Service in Doldrums92
XIIIUse of force-Legal Implications101
XIVRole of the Press102
XVGeneral Atmosphere in the Country105
3The Holocaust109
IThe 3rd June Announcement109
IIUnending Communal Carnage114
IIIAssurances to Minorities126
IVHell Broke Loose in Independent India and Pakistan134
VBiggest Migration in History178
VIIThe Death Toll214
4The Principal Actors223
IIndian Leaders through the Eyes of the British224
IIMountbatten230
IIIGandhi243
IVNehru253
VJinnah265
VIVallabhbhai Patel269
VIIRelations between Nehru and Patel273
VIIISupporting Actors278
5The Inquest286
IThe Holocaust-Varied Reactions286
IINagging Questions300
1Unwarranted haste in transfer of power300
2There were clear forewarnings of the holocaust311
3Pleas of the Sikhs fell on deaf ears322
4Demands for exchange of populations336
5Empty threats vs. actual use of force349
6Non-arrest of Sikh Leaders358
7Myth of the Punjab Boundary Force363
8Premature withdrawal of British troops and officers377
9Division of the Indian Armed Forces385
10Partition with undecided borders392
11Civil administration in doldrums400
12Political Parties and Communal violence409
13Gandhi's reluctance to visit the Punjab413
14There was no contingency Plan415
IIINo Enquiry, Not Even A Monument425
6The Partition in Retrospect428
IIntroduction428
IIJinnah's illness433
IIIInterim Government with Two Cabinets439
IVCompromises at What Cost?444
VUnpartitioned India: Ungovernable, Unliveable463
VIThe New Beginning476
VIILessons of Partition and Portents496
VIIIIndia will Have to Find its Own Answers543
Appendix IWith a Refugee Column548
Appendix IIRetrospect553
Appendix IIIMountbatten's Self-defence555




















Post a Comment
 
Post Review
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy

Related Items

The Holocaust of Indian Partition: An Inquest
by Madhav Godbole
Hardcover (Edition: 2006)
Rupa Publication Pvt. Ltd.
Item Code: IDH605
$55.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
From Plassey To Partition: A History of Modern India
by Sekhar Bandyopadhyay
Paperback (Edition: 2013)
Orient Black Swan
Item Code: IDI527
$27.50
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Kashmir:  A Tale of Partition (Set of 2 Volumes)
by M.G. Chitkara
Hardcover (Edition: 2002)
A.P.H. Publishing Corporation
Item Code: NAK486
$125.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Price of Partition (Recollection and Reflections)
by Rafiq Zakaria
Hardcover (Edition: 1998)
Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan
Item Code: NAE980
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Guilty Men of India's Partition
by Rammanohar Lohia
Paperback (Edition: 2012)
B.R. Publishing Corporation
Item Code: NAL283
$10.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Partition of India Why 1947?
by Kaushik Roy
Hardcover (Edition: 2012)
Oxford University Press
Item Code: NAH216
$40.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Indus Saga: From Pataliputra to Partition
by Aitzaz Ahsan
Hardcover (Edition: 2005)
Roli Books
Item Code: IDF387
$31.50
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Stories About the Partition of India (Set of Two Books)
Item Code: NAM972
$105.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Bearing Witness (Partition, Independence, End of The Raj)
by Sukeshi Kamra
Hardcover (Edition: 2003)
Lotus Collection
Item Code: NAH095
$50.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Making of Exile (Sindhi Hindus and the Partition of India)
by Nandita Bhavnani
Hardcover (Edition: 2014)
Tranquebar Press
Item Code: NAJ090
$40.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Partition of India (Legend and Reality)
Item Code: NAF237
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now

Testimonials

Very grateful for this service, of making this precious treasure of Haveli Sangeet for ThakurJi so easily in the US. Appreciate the fact that notation is provided.
Leena, USA.
The Bhairava painting I ordered by Sri Kailash Raj is excellent. I have been purchasing from Exotic India for well over a decade and am always beyond delighted with my extraordinary purchases and customer service. Thank you.
Marc, UK
I have been buying from Exotic India for years and am always pleased and excited to receive my packages. Thanks for the quality products.
Delia, USA
As ever, brilliant price and service.
Howard, UK.
The best and fastest service worldwide - I am in Australia and I put in a big order of books (14 items) on a Wednesday; it was sent on Friday and arrived at my doorstep early on Monday morning - amazing! All very securely packed in a very strong cardboard box. I have bought several times from Exotic India and the service is always exceptionally good. THANK YOU and NAMASTE!
Charles (Rudra)
I just wanted to say that this is I think my 3rd (big) order from you, and the last two times I received immaculate service, the books arrived well and it has been a very pleasant experience. Just wanted to say thanks for your efficient service.
Shantala, Belgium
Thank you so much EXOTIC INDIA for the wonderfull packaging!! I received my order today and it was gift wrapped with so much love and taste in a beautiful golden gift wrap and everything was neat and beautifully packed. Also my order came very fast... i am impressed! Besides selling fantastic items, you provide an exceptional customer service and i will surely purchase again from you! I am very glad and happy :) Thank you, Salma
Salma, Canada.
Artwork received today. Very pleased both with the product quality and speed of delivery. Many thanks for your help.
Carl, UK.
I wanted to let you know how happy we are with our framed pieces of Shree Durga and Shree Kali. Thank you and thank your framers for us. By the way, this month we offered a Puja and Yagna to the Ardhanarishwara murti we purchased from you last November. The Brahmin priest, Shree Vivek Godbol, who was visiting LA preformed the rites. He really loved our murti and thought it very paka. I am so happy to have found your site , it is very paka and trustworthy. Plus such great packing and quick shipping. Thanks for your service Vipin, it is a pleasure.
Gina, USA
My marble statue of Durga arrived today in perfect condition, it's such a beautiful statue. Thanks again for giving me a discount on it, I'm always very pleased with the items I order from you. You always have the best quality items.
Charles, Tennessee
TRUSTe
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2017 © Exotic India