In the late 1990s, a major controversy broke when I started to critique Wendy Doniger's depictions of Hinduism which most Hindus found vulgar and outright insulting. Some were too embarrassed to face them while many others found it too controversial to go public with their feelings. What started out as my debate with her students quickly turned into public outrage. There were numerous demands for better representation by practicing Hindus in the scholarship about their tradition.
Things flared up between the Indian diaspora and the American academy for several years, with numerous mobilizations and accusations from both sides. This fight was one of the defining moments in the awakening of Hindu thinkers about the way their discourse was controlled and distorted by others. The academic study of Hinduism has not been the same since.
The drama further intensified because with the help of her hordes of powerfully placed students, Doniger fought back. She arranged a front page article in The Washington Post and another feature article in The New York Times. Unlike the balanced treatment by the magazine of her own university, these were PR jobs tilted heavily in her favor.
The theatre widened across the academic and literary circles of Europe, North America and India as more players joined in on both sides.
Martha Nussbaum, the prominent feminist and University of Chicago colleague of Doniger, wrote a scathing book against Hindus and Hinduism with a whole chapter dedicated to me-without bothering to interview me even though that was suggested to her. She and Doniger have consistently ignored my requests for a live debate in public.
In response to what I felt was a one-sided portrayal of the events, three supporters compiled a new book, titled, "Invading the Sacred: An Analysis of Hinduism Studies in America", and it was published in 2007. Its launch video gives a good idea of our side of the story.
The fallout of all this was very significant:
1.Wendy Doniger lost her clout in the American academy and found herself on the defensive. She lost most of the students who earlier thronged at her doorstep for PhDs in Hinduism.
2.The American academy made numerous changes (still not enough) to become sensitive to Hindus' views; at least these academics have become less blatant in their denigration of Hinduism.
3.The most significant change was that there emerged a new appreciation among Hindus and a new mobilization of their leaders. It became widely accepted that it was a bad idea to outsource the study of our tradition to scholars whose lenses were programmed with Judeo-Christian and/or Marxist doctrines. In fact, no other major world faith is studied by outsiders with the same authority, power and negative perspective as Hinduism is.
4.A brilliant compilation of these debates and controversies has recently been turned into a web site for those who want to get a good overview.
Meanwhile, I moved on to many other projects of research and publishing, pretty much forgetting Wendy Doniger as a closed chapter for my work. But the story does not end here.
Some years back, Doniger struck a new alliance to help her make a dramatic comeback: She positioned herself with the Indian Left as their "expert on criticizing Hinduism". Since Indian secularists are uneducated in Sanskrit and are only superficially informed about religious studies, Doniger was a useful ally to supply them "masala" which they could use in their simplistic works.
In turn, the well-connected Indian secularist/leftist media and writers helped to reposition Doniger within India as a great authority on Hinduism. Soon she was winning awards in India, even though back home in the U.S. her own academic colleagues had distanced themselves because she was seen as a tainted scholar with a bad reputation.
Then another chapter began. Some Hindus in India decided to contest her relatively recent book published by Penguin. They filed a lawsuit in Delhi alleging that it was biased and insulting to Hindus. This sparked a new controversy-this time between Hindus in India and the Doniger/Indian Left alliance.
After four years of litigation, an out-of-court settlement was recently reached under which Penguin agreed to withdraw the book from India. But the terms agreed to do not ban electronic copies or foreign editions from being sold in India.
Doniger's massive PR machinery went to work overtime to put the matter in the limelight of world news.
|1||The Academic Cult of Eroticizing Hindu||1|
|2||The Asymmetric Dialog of Civilizations||17|
|3||The Axis of Neoco;onialism||37|
|4||RISA Lila- 1: Wendy's Child Syndrome||90|
|5||RISA Lila- 2: Limp Scholarship and Demonology||168|
|6||Wendy Doniger on the Couch: A Tantric Psychoanalysis||239|
|7||The Insider/Outsider: Academic Game of Sarah Caldwell||247|
|8||Response to Jeffrey Kripal's Sulekha Artical||294|
|9||The Bindi as a Drop of Menstrual Blood||325|
|10||The Interpretation of Gods||344|
|11||The Washington Post and Hinduphobia||359|
|12||Challenging The Washington post||405|
|13||Hinduism in American Classrooms||416|
Item Code: NAM996 Author: Rajiv Malhotra Cover: Paperback Edition: 2016 Publisher: Voice of India, New Delhi ISBN: 9789385485015 Language: English Size: 8.5 inch X 5.5 inch Pages: 442 (17 Pages B/W Illustrations) Other Details: Weight of the Book: 565 gms