SARVADARSANASAMGRAHA ascribed to Madhavacarya (Chapter 16: Samkaradarsanam)

FREE Delivery
Delivery Ships in 1-3 days
Item Code: IDH520
Author: Klaus K. Klostermaier
Publisher: The Adyar Library and Research Centre
Edition: 1999
ISBN: 8185141320
Pages: 156
Cover: Hardcover
Other Details 8.5" X 5.5"
Weight 330 gm
Fully insured
Fully insured
Shipped to 153 countries
Shipped to 153 countries
More than 1M+ customers worldwide
More than 1M+ customers worldwide
100% Made in India
100% Made in India
23 years in business
23 years in business
Book Description

From the Jacket

Sarvadarsanasamgraha ascribed to Madhavacarya was translated into English by E.B. Cowell and A.E. Gough; The last section dealing with Smkaradarsana which was not included there has now been translated by Klaus K. Klostermaier, and is being published here with the original texts. Ananthalal Thakur has shown that the real author was Cennu Bhatta, one of the Pandits in the court of Madhava.


The Sarvadarsanasamgraha, ascribed to Madhava, deals with the different systems of philosophy in India, and has been very popular. The last section deals with Samkara s system. E.B. Cowell and A,E. Gough translated the text (except the last section) into English (London, 1892, 1894). An English translation of the last chapter by Klaus K. Klostermaier is being published here.

In an article published in ALB (vol. 25, 524-38) 'Canni Bhatta and the authorship of the Sarvadarsana- samgraha' Professor Ananthalal Thakur has shown that the Sarvadarsanasamgraha, though ascribed to Madhava, is really the work of Canni Bhatta (Cinna Bhatta or Cennu Bhatta), a younger contemporary of Madhava and Sayana and son of Sarvajiiavisnu who was also the teacher of Sayana, and Madhava. Cannu Bhatta is the author of Prakasika commentary on the Tarkabhasa of Kesava Misra (BORI, 1937), and the Vivarana commentary on Varadaraja's Tarkikaraksa- sarasamgraha. This Canna Bhatta was one of the many Pandits in the court of Madhava, and rose to the position of Rajapandita.

In the Vivarana, at the conclusion of the Anumana section he says that, 'positive and negative coexistence indubitably establishes invariable concomitance when corroborative arguments come to their aid'. He adds that this has been established in his own Sarvadarsana- samgraha :

anukulatarkasanathayor anvayavyatirekayor avina- bhavaniscayakatvam sarvadarsanasamgrahe ' smabhir upapaditam iti tata evavadhatavyam. (V. p.l56) The attribution of Sarvadarsanasamgraha of Cannu Bhatta to Madhava may be explained on the ground that the work was written under the patronage of Madhava, and at his instance.

In the introduction to this English Translation Dr. Klostermaier has taken the generally accepted view that Madhavacarya is the author of the work. But now we have definite evidence to show that Cennu Bhatta is the author (see Ananthalal Thakur's paper in the ALB, vol. 25). The translation is based on the BORI edition of the text, keeping the line numbers to enable the readers to check with the original without difficulty. Professor Thangaswami Sarma who helped the translator in understanding the text was available in the Library for consultation wherever necessary. The English Translation was published in the ALB, 1997. It is reprinted in this volume. The Sanskrit text published as an appendix retains the original number of the BORI edition.


E.B. Cowell and A.E. Gough, in their often reprinted translation of the Sarvadarsanasamgraha (SDS) concluded their work after the fifteenth chapter (Patanjaladarsanam) with the remark that the author had dealt with the Advaita system in another of his works and had thus left it out from the SDS.2 Vasudev Shastri Abhyankar, whose Sanskrit text of the SDS has become the most widely used edition, includes a sixteenth chapter dealing with the Samkaradarsanam.

Doubts as regards the authenticity of Ch. XVI have been expressed. Internal as well as external reasons can be found to accept it as the work of the author of the SDS. I agree with Hajime Nakamura" that this chapter 'is closely and consistently linked up with the preceding chapters' and that 'the idioms and the style of this chapter are similar to those of the preceding chapters'. There are frequent (implicit) cross-references to former chapters (especially in the polemics against Samkhya and Mimamsa) and it makes use of sources drawn upon before.

. Considering the structure of the SDS it makes eminent sense to crown the polemics against all other systems with a statement on Advaita Vedanta, from whose vantage point the critique was undertaken, even if systems were eliminated with the arguments of systems other than Advaita. Chap. XVI offers a critique of all the major systems no longer from the standpoint of another (objectionable) system but from the 'ultimate' standpoint of the only true system Advaita Vedanta.

Finally, following a cue in the Mangalasloka (v. 4), where Madhava describes his work as a garland of variegated flowers, keeping in mind that garlands normally contain multiples of 8, does it not make better sense to have 16 (2 x 8) than 15 chapters ?

The SDS has been commonly ascribed to Madhava, A.D. 1296-1386, the author of the Vivaranaprameya- samgraha, the Jivanmuktiviveka, the Pancadasi, the commentary on the Parasarasmrti and some other works. The identity of Sayana Madhava and Vidyaranya Bharatitirtha has been widely discussed. This is not the place to enter into the ongoing debate about the person and the life work of the author of the SDS. P.V. Kane' and R. Thangaswami have ably summarized the literature and have confirmed the traditional position.

The teachings of Madhavacarya have been expounded in a masterful way by T.M.P. Mahadevan. The part of the SDS whose translation follows does not substantially add to, or change, this account.

The SDS has attracted the attention of scholars ever since its text was rediscovered: its conciseness and its completeness as well as the method it employed gave it a unique character. Since the early pioneers made their translation of it, much work has been done. Better manuscripts of the SDS were found, individual texts of the many systems dealt with in the SDS were published and translated and several of the chapters of the SDS were freshly translated.

All translators of the SDS have commented on its difficulty. The style is terse and sometimes elliptic. The great number of works referred to or quoted from-frequently exhibiting considerable textual differences vis-a-vis the editions which we possess-and the rapid changes from objection to argument to counter-objection etc. tend to obfuscate the line of thought.

In preparing the present translation I have had the good fortune of expert advice and help. Sri R. Thangaswami, Reader in Sanskrit, University of Madras, went with me through the text while I was on sabbatical leave from the University of Manitoba and was associated as visiting Professor with the S. Radhakrishnan Institute for the Advanced Study of Philosophy at the University of Madras.

Pandit Thangaswami's mastery of Sanskrit and his intimate knowledge of the Sastra-s made this an educational experience for me. Back home in Manitoba, I had the advantage of being able to revise parts of my translation with the help of Dr. T. R. V. Murti (Benares) and Dr. R. Balasubramaniam (Madras), who, on a' visit to some Canadian univer- sities, spent- some time here. I have to thank them for many improvements and corrections. I take full responsibility for the shortcomings of this first translation.

V.S. Abhyankar was able to trace a fairly large number of quotations in the Samkaradarsana chapter. H. Nakamura added quite a few to these. I have been able to track down a few more while admitting defeat in about a dozen cases.

In translating this chapter I have found V.S. Abhyankar's Sanskrit commentary to his edition helpful and have also made use of Professor Shankar Sharma's Hindi paraphrase. The line number in the translation refers to that of the Sanskrit text in BORI edition.

  Preface v
  Introduction 1
1 Refutation of Samkhya 5
1a No Scriptural proof for causality of prakrti 6
1b Refutation of Samkhya illustration 7
2 Subject Matter of the Vedanta Sutra 11
3 Desire to know Brahman: first Adhikarana 13
4 Desire to know the Atman is impossible impossibility of Doubt 13
4a Impossibility of Desire, to know the Self 16
5 Possibility of Beginning of Brahmajijnasa: Urrarapaksa 20
5a Example for these Six Characteristics 21
6 Superimposition of Self Examination of the Vaisesika System 22
6a Prof. of Superimposition of Atman, refutation of Difference 24
6b Jaina Opiniion of jiva Refuted 25
7 Refutation of Yogacaras-Vijnana is Atman 26
8 Doubt about the Subject of Atman 28
9 Agama as the Means to Ascertain Brahman 30
10 Purvapaksa: For obtaining Definite Knowledge the Veda is not a pramana 31
10a Meaning of Words from Established Meaning: Uttarapaksa 33
11 Explanation of superimposition-Shape of Change of World 36
11a Difference of Superimposition 36
12 Criticism of superimposition by Mimamsaka-s: long Purvapaksa 38
12a Absence of proof for illusory knowledge 39
12b There is no knowledge of the content of non Being 41
12c Conjuction of cognition and Remembrance 41
12d Non-Difference or Identity of perception and memory 43
12e The common Explanation of Yellow Conch 45
13 The final Proof that is not silver the Mimamsaka opion 46
13a Critique of Abhava from Prabhakara Standpoint 47
14 The reality of Illusory knowledge- Samkara's Answer 49
14a Superimposition of nacre on silver 51
15 Assuaging Doubt Concerning Superimposition 54
15a Reply to Mimamsaka Criticism 55
16 Censure of Madhyamika: Erroneous Thought 58
16a Refutation of Vijnanavadin-s Erroneous Thought 59
16b Refutation of the Anyathakhyati of the Naiyayika-s 61
17 Unity of Cognition of this and silver Doubt and Resolution 62
18 Threefold Truth and the Anirvacaniyakhyati 64
18a Sameness of Maya and Avidya 66
19 Proof for the Existence of Avidya 68
19a Refutation of Naiyayika and The Direct Experience of I am Ignorant 69
20 Establishment of the nature of ignorance through another interpretation of I am ignorant 72
21 Establishment of nescience through inference 73
22 Avidya can be ascertained from sruti 76
23 Maya sakti in Saktism 77
24 The world is a projection of nescience 78
25 Critique of the Reality of the world: there is no sublation of Reality 83
26 Cessation of Nescience through self-Knowledge- The Parable of the Prince 85
27 Conclusion of First Sutra and Connection with Following 88
28 The other Sutras of Catuhsutri Svarupa and Tatastha Laksana 88
  Bibliography 91
  Notes 96
  Appendix: Samkaradarsanam 105

Sample Pages

Click Here for More Books Published By Adyar Library and Research Centre

Frequently Asked Questions
  • Q. What locations do you deliver to ?
    A. Exotic India delivers orders to all countries having diplomatic relations with India.
  • Q. Do you offer free shipping ?
    A. Exotic India offers free shipping on all orders of value of $30 USD or more.
  • Q. Can I return the book?
    A. All returns must be postmarked within seven (7) days of the delivery date. All returned items must be in new and unused condition, with all original tags and labels attached. To know more please view our return policy
  • Q. Do you offer express shipping ?
    A. Yes, we do have a chargeable express shipping facility available. You can select express shipping while checking out on the website.
  • Q. I accidentally entered wrong delivery address, can I change the address ?
    A. Delivery addresses can only be changed only incase the order has not been shipped yet. Incase of an address change, you can reach us at
  • Q. How do I track my order ?
    A. You can track your orders simply entering your order number through here or through your past orders if you are signed in on the website.
  • Q. How can I cancel an order ?
    A. An order can only be cancelled if it has not been shipped. To cancel an order, kindly reach out to us through
Add a review
Have A Question

For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy

Book Categories