Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address info@exoticindia.com.

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Sign In  |  Sign up
Your Cart (0)
Best Deals
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > Philosophy > Philosophers > World View and Theory in Indian Philosophy
Subscribe to our newsletter and discounts
World View and Theory in Indian Philosophy
Pages from the book
World View and Theory in Indian Philosophy
Look Inside the Book
Description

About the Book

World View and Theory in Indian Philosophy explores the complex and rarely investigated relation between world views upheld by Indian philosophers and philosophical theories they developed. What was the actual background (social, cultural, religious, linguistic, etc.) of world views and philosophical concepts in ancient and classical India? How did world views influence philosophical theories developed in ancient and mediaeval South Asia? Is it at all possible to draw a distinction between a philosophical theory and a world view in Indian context?

These are by no means trivial questions, and the insight gained through their analysis in the context of Indian culture can also contribute to our better understanding of philosophical enquiry in other cultural contexts where philosophy was cultivated.

A number of world renowned scholars have contributed to this volume, exploring major philosophical schools such as Buddhism, Jainism, Anviksiki, Nyaya, vaisesika, Mimamsa, Vedanta, Sankhya, Yoga, materialist as well as legal schools of thought. The reader will find illuminating insights into how Indian philosophers viewed the foundations of reason, how they rationalised emotions and comprehended their role, how they understood the concepts of the individual or self vis-a-vis impersonal ism and where roots of Indian epistemology and logic may lie, among other matters in this timely volume.

 

About the Author

Piotr Balcerowicz is professor of philosophy and South Asian studies at the University of Warsaw, also specialises in intercultural relations, conflict management and contemporary history of Asia. An author of about 90 publications and editor of several volumes on Indian philosophy, religion and culture, is also a founder of an NGO Education for Peace which brings development aid to countries of Asia and Africa.

 

Preface

How can we know that our brain (consisting apparently of cool and moist tissue) allegedly is neither an organ providing control over actions of our bodies nor responsible for our mental processes, including information processing, thinking and rationality, but an organ meant solely to cool hot blood heated up in our hearts? As Aristotle argues, 'Since everything needs its opposite [to counterbalance it], so that it preserves its moderation and the mean (for it is in the mean, not in either of the extremes, that true essence and rationality lies), nature has developed the brain to counterbalance the region of the heart along-side the heat contained in it. .. ' (On the Parts of Animals 652b). Such a conclusion was not merely driven by a lack of adequate understanding of physical structure and functions of living organisms in Ancient Greece and Aristotle's general presupposition that everything needs its opposite to counterbalance it, which provided a theoretical scheme for his endeavour to describe the workings of human body and its anatomy. In fact, his conclusion, which seems so counterintuitive from the viewpoint of modem science, which allocates the site of all mental processes precisely in the brain, was influenced by a dualistic world view which juxtaposed inert matter, e.g. bodies (including celestial bodies) and souls, as the singular conscious agents that trigger all motion in the universe, expressed by the Stagirite just a few lines before the above reasoning: 'Indeed, nutrition and causing motion of the body are the functions of the soul' (On the Parts of Animals 652b). Ergo they cannot belong to the body and its brain. Rationality and source of motion had therefore to lie outside of the body, composed of inanimate matter, and such a world view consequently left no room for even a faint possibility that the brain could perform any operations and tasks which are nowadays associated with it.

The above case can serve as an illustration of how our theories, including philosophical theories and whole philosophical systems, are effectively affected by preconceived beliefs and are construed within a conceptual frame-work imposed by a particular world view, to which we have been acculturated and which often proves much more rigid and inflexible then one would expect.

Philosophers are humans, flesh and blood and belief, in whom rationality and irrationality meet like in any other omnivorous or vegetarian human. Philosophical systems and theories are, in theory at least, constructed rationally and supposed to fulfil a requirement of consistency, whereas world views often are not. When dealing with, say, what is good, desirable, useful, pleasurable etc., ethics as a system is a theory, whereas morality understood as people's set of beliefs on how to live properly is not. In traditional societies world views, one of whose roles was to provide an explanation for things we objectively could not (or subjectively did not want to) investigate fully rationally and thoroughly, were often shaped by religious convictions. In addition, world views were equally an emanation of a particular social set-up (including power structure) and a position a particular individual or group occupied within it, and when it expresses the group's interests of social, economic and political nature, they become ideologies.

But a question arises whether we can at all speak of world views or ideologies in Indian philosophies or theoretical systems (scientific, legal etc.), or in classical Indian culture in general? Further, provided we could answer the above in the positive, what would be the way to draw a differentiating line between a philosophical theory and a world view in India so that it could be equally meaningful and useful in our cultural analysis of Indian cultural and intellectual context?

Clearly Indians were not exception, and we may justifiably expect that we can indeed speak of world views and ideologies also in India which had their palpable impact on how theoretical (Philosophical, legal and other) systems were constructed and on how the understanding of certain ideas and notions was affected, and often restricted by the way one believed the world was or should be. Also in India such world views and ideologies which nurtured philosophical theories were frequently of religious nature, but not exclusively.

What was then the actual background of world views and ideologies which were at work while particular philosophical theories were being developed in India? How far was social, cultural, religious, linguistic and other factors influenced the way philosophical theories where moulded? And to what degree, if at all, the same factors informed world views and ideologies? Did language have any traceable impact on the formation of world views, ideologies or philosophical theories? Did philosophical ideas and legal theories reflect social structure, power set-up or political institutions? And vice versa, were theories and philosophical concepts of how the society and the state should function reflected in institutions in classical Indian society? What was the actual relationship between world views and theories in India? Were the relations between 'background' phenomena on the one hand and ideologies and theories on the other universal or specific to pre-modern India? Are conceivable findings to these questions merely India-specific or can one extrapolate results obtained from the study of Indian traditions and cultures to other regions of the world? Can these findings tell us anything universal about what it means to be human, to have a world view, to entertain a belief or to rationally develop an explanatory theory?

These are the considerations and reflections, mediating between research on the Indian tradition of thought and other branches of cultural studies, which informed a range of analyses compiled into the present volume. Some of these contributions, albeit not all, were presented in person by the authors during the International Conference 'World view and theory in Indian philosophy', which was held in Barcelona, Spain, between 26-30 April, 2009 (for a detailed programme of the Conference see below p. 11). This Congreso Internacional 'Teoria e ideologia en las filosofias de la India' was at the same time the first conference on South-Asian Studies held in Spain, which attracted most (if not all) Spanish Indologists with an intention to boost South-Asian studies in the Iberian Peninsula.

The Organising Committee of the Conference comprised as organisers Piotr Balcerowicz (no academic affiliation), Johannes Bronkhorst (Universite de Lausanne), Claus Oetke (Stockholm University), Martin Sevilla Rodriguez (Universidad de Oviedo) and Jose Virgilio Garcia Trabazo (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela). The Co-organiser was Casa Asia (www.casaaisia.org) which provided the (absolutely marvellous!) venue for the conference. The advisory board of the Organising Committee included Juan Arnau (CSIC, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas) and Juan Luis Vermal (Illes Balears). The Conference was sponsored by the grant under the Antoni Montserrat Programme 2009, summoned yearly by Casa Asia, without which the conference could not have taken place.

I would like to avail myself of this opportunity to express, on behalf of the organisers of the conference and myself, most profound thanks to Casa Asia and its most friendly and efficient staff for the excellent co-operation and organisation as well as for the generous Antoni Montserrat grant. I personally fell most obliged to my dear colleagues who were conference organisers and advisers for their invaluable involvement in the conference as well as to Eva Borreguero, the director of Eucational Programmes of Casa Asia, Barcelona, for exemplary collaboration.

The present volume appears as Volume Five of the series Warsaw Indological Studies edited by the undersigned, and its publication is in part supported by the Faculty of Oriental Studies, the University of Warsaw.

 

Contents

 

Preface 7
Contributors 13
World Views In Contention And Exchange  
Johannes Bronkhorst: Buddhist Thought Versus Brahmanical Thought 21
Vincent Eltschinger: Apocalypticism, Heresy and Philosophy 29
Emilio Garcia Buendia: Parmenides and the Sat-karya-vada Doctrine of Samkhya 87
World Views And Systems  
Andrew J. Nicholson: Doxography and Boundary-Formation in Late Medieval India 103
Lawrence Mccrea: Rationalisation and Sincerity in Mimamsa Hermeneutics 119
Takanori Suzuki: On the Variety of Commentarial Approaches among the Commentators of the Padartha-dharma-samgraha: A Reconsideration of the Notion of the 'Vaisesika School' 137
Ernst Prets: A Review of the Early Nyaya Fragments 155
Piotr Balcerowicz: When Yoga is not Yoga. The Nyaya- Vaisesika tradition and the Artha-sastra 173
World Views And Persons  
Jonardon Ganeri: Buddhist Individuals and Inward Empathy 249
Joerg Tuske: Santaraksita on the Emotions 263
Jean-Marie Verpoorten: Some Aspects of Atman According to Prabhakara and Salikanatha 277
Timothy Lubin: The Polity of the Philosopher-Bureaucrat: Brahmanical Virtue as a Qualification for Public Office 299
Shujun Motegi: The Concept of Non-Possession in the Moksa-dharma 327
Paolo Magnone: Aho kausalam apurvam. Hermeneutical wrigglings about the Isopanisad 349
Theory Of World View  
Claus Oetke: 'World View' as a Topic of Research in Indian Studies 369
Brendan Gillon: The Correspondence Principle 381
Stephen H. Phillips: Cannibalising Nyaya Epistemology 399
Hiroshi Marui: The Meaning of a Diversity of Established World Views or Tenets (siddhanta) in the Science of Debate: With Special Reference to Jayanta's Interpretation of the Abhyupagama-siddhanta (NS 1.1.31) and its Evaluation in the Development of Nyaya System 407
General Index 433

 




















World View and Theory in Indian Philosophy

Item Code:
NAM913
Cover:
Hardcover
Edition:
2012
ISBN:
9789350980125
Language:
English
Size:
10.0 inch X 6.5 inch
Pages:
470
Other Details:
Weight of the Book: 815 gms
Price:
$55.00   Shipping Free - 4 to 6 days
Look Inside the Book
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
World View and Theory in Indian Philosophy

Verify the characters on the left

From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 1374 times since 21st Sep, 2016

About the Book

World View and Theory in Indian Philosophy explores the complex and rarely investigated relation between world views upheld by Indian philosophers and philosophical theories they developed. What was the actual background (social, cultural, religious, linguistic, etc.) of world views and philosophical concepts in ancient and classical India? How did world views influence philosophical theories developed in ancient and mediaeval South Asia? Is it at all possible to draw a distinction between a philosophical theory and a world view in Indian context?

These are by no means trivial questions, and the insight gained through their analysis in the context of Indian culture can also contribute to our better understanding of philosophical enquiry in other cultural contexts where philosophy was cultivated.

A number of world renowned scholars have contributed to this volume, exploring major philosophical schools such as Buddhism, Jainism, Anviksiki, Nyaya, vaisesika, Mimamsa, Vedanta, Sankhya, Yoga, materialist as well as legal schools of thought. The reader will find illuminating insights into how Indian philosophers viewed the foundations of reason, how they rationalised emotions and comprehended their role, how they understood the concepts of the individual or self vis-a-vis impersonal ism and where roots of Indian epistemology and logic may lie, among other matters in this timely volume.

 

About the Author

Piotr Balcerowicz is professor of philosophy and South Asian studies at the University of Warsaw, also specialises in intercultural relations, conflict management and contemporary history of Asia. An author of about 90 publications and editor of several volumes on Indian philosophy, religion and culture, is also a founder of an NGO Education for Peace which brings development aid to countries of Asia and Africa.

 

Preface

How can we know that our brain (consisting apparently of cool and moist tissue) allegedly is neither an organ providing control over actions of our bodies nor responsible for our mental processes, including information processing, thinking and rationality, but an organ meant solely to cool hot blood heated up in our hearts? As Aristotle argues, 'Since everything needs its opposite [to counterbalance it], so that it preserves its moderation and the mean (for it is in the mean, not in either of the extremes, that true essence and rationality lies), nature has developed the brain to counterbalance the region of the heart along-side the heat contained in it. .. ' (On the Parts of Animals 652b). Such a conclusion was not merely driven by a lack of adequate understanding of physical structure and functions of living organisms in Ancient Greece and Aristotle's general presupposition that everything needs its opposite to counterbalance it, which provided a theoretical scheme for his endeavour to describe the workings of human body and its anatomy. In fact, his conclusion, which seems so counterintuitive from the viewpoint of modem science, which allocates the site of all mental processes precisely in the brain, was influenced by a dualistic world view which juxtaposed inert matter, e.g. bodies (including celestial bodies) and souls, as the singular conscious agents that trigger all motion in the universe, expressed by the Stagirite just a few lines before the above reasoning: 'Indeed, nutrition and causing motion of the body are the functions of the soul' (On the Parts of Animals 652b). Ergo they cannot belong to the body and its brain. Rationality and source of motion had therefore to lie outside of the body, composed of inanimate matter, and such a world view consequently left no room for even a faint possibility that the brain could perform any operations and tasks which are nowadays associated with it.

The above case can serve as an illustration of how our theories, including philosophical theories and whole philosophical systems, are effectively affected by preconceived beliefs and are construed within a conceptual frame-work imposed by a particular world view, to which we have been acculturated and which often proves much more rigid and inflexible then one would expect.

Philosophers are humans, flesh and blood and belief, in whom rationality and irrationality meet like in any other omnivorous or vegetarian human. Philosophical systems and theories are, in theory at least, constructed rationally and supposed to fulfil a requirement of consistency, whereas world views often are not. When dealing with, say, what is good, desirable, useful, pleasurable etc., ethics as a system is a theory, whereas morality understood as people's set of beliefs on how to live properly is not. In traditional societies world views, one of whose roles was to provide an explanation for things we objectively could not (or subjectively did not want to) investigate fully rationally and thoroughly, were often shaped by religious convictions. In addition, world views were equally an emanation of a particular social set-up (including power structure) and a position a particular individual or group occupied within it, and when it expresses the group's interests of social, economic and political nature, they become ideologies.

But a question arises whether we can at all speak of world views or ideologies in Indian philosophies or theoretical systems (scientific, legal etc.), or in classical Indian culture in general? Further, provided we could answer the above in the positive, what would be the way to draw a differentiating line between a philosophical theory and a world view in India so that it could be equally meaningful and useful in our cultural analysis of Indian cultural and intellectual context?

Clearly Indians were not exception, and we may justifiably expect that we can indeed speak of world views and ideologies also in India which had their palpable impact on how theoretical (Philosophical, legal and other) systems were constructed and on how the understanding of certain ideas and notions was affected, and often restricted by the way one believed the world was or should be. Also in India such world views and ideologies which nurtured philosophical theories were frequently of religious nature, but not exclusively.

What was then the actual background of world views and ideologies which were at work while particular philosophical theories were being developed in India? How far was social, cultural, religious, linguistic and other factors influenced the way philosophical theories where moulded? And to what degree, if at all, the same factors informed world views and ideologies? Did language have any traceable impact on the formation of world views, ideologies or philosophical theories? Did philosophical ideas and legal theories reflect social structure, power set-up or political institutions? And vice versa, were theories and philosophical concepts of how the society and the state should function reflected in institutions in classical Indian society? What was the actual relationship between world views and theories in India? Were the relations between 'background' phenomena on the one hand and ideologies and theories on the other universal or specific to pre-modern India? Are conceivable findings to these questions merely India-specific or can one extrapolate results obtained from the study of Indian traditions and cultures to other regions of the world? Can these findings tell us anything universal about what it means to be human, to have a world view, to entertain a belief or to rationally develop an explanatory theory?

These are the considerations and reflections, mediating between research on the Indian tradition of thought and other branches of cultural studies, which informed a range of analyses compiled into the present volume. Some of these contributions, albeit not all, were presented in person by the authors during the International Conference 'World view and theory in Indian philosophy', which was held in Barcelona, Spain, between 26-30 April, 2009 (for a detailed programme of the Conference see below p. 11). This Congreso Internacional 'Teoria e ideologia en las filosofias de la India' was at the same time the first conference on South-Asian Studies held in Spain, which attracted most (if not all) Spanish Indologists with an intention to boost South-Asian studies in the Iberian Peninsula.

The Organising Committee of the Conference comprised as organisers Piotr Balcerowicz (no academic affiliation), Johannes Bronkhorst (Universite de Lausanne), Claus Oetke (Stockholm University), Martin Sevilla Rodriguez (Universidad de Oviedo) and Jose Virgilio Garcia Trabazo (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela). The Co-organiser was Casa Asia (www.casaaisia.org) which provided the (absolutely marvellous!) venue for the conference. The advisory board of the Organising Committee included Juan Arnau (CSIC, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas) and Juan Luis Vermal (Illes Balears). The Conference was sponsored by the grant under the Antoni Montserrat Programme 2009, summoned yearly by Casa Asia, without which the conference could not have taken place.

I would like to avail myself of this opportunity to express, on behalf of the organisers of the conference and myself, most profound thanks to Casa Asia and its most friendly and efficient staff for the excellent co-operation and organisation as well as for the generous Antoni Montserrat grant. I personally fell most obliged to my dear colleagues who were conference organisers and advisers for their invaluable involvement in the conference as well as to Eva Borreguero, the director of Eucational Programmes of Casa Asia, Barcelona, for exemplary collaboration.

The present volume appears as Volume Five of the series Warsaw Indological Studies edited by the undersigned, and its publication is in part supported by the Faculty of Oriental Studies, the University of Warsaw.

 

Contents

 

Preface 7
Contributors 13
World Views In Contention And Exchange  
Johannes Bronkhorst: Buddhist Thought Versus Brahmanical Thought 21
Vincent Eltschinger: Apocalypticism, Heresy and Philosophy 29
Emilio Garcia Buendia: Parmenides and the Sat-karya-vada Doctrine of Samkhya 87
World Views And Systems  
Andrew J. Nicholson: Doxography and Boundary-Formation in Late Medieval India 103
Lawrence Mccrea: Rationalisation and Sincerity in Mimamsa Hermeneutics 119
Takanori Suzuki: On the Variety of Commentarial Approaches among the Commentators of the Padartha-dharma-samgraha: A Reconsideration of the Notion of the 'Vaisesika School' 137
Ernst Prets: A Review of the Early Nyaya Fragments 155
Piotr Balcerowicz: When Yoga is not Yoga. The Nyaya- Vaisesika tradition and the Artha-sastra 173
World Views And Persons  
Jonardon Ganeri: Buddhist Individuals and Inward Empathy 249
Joerg Tuske: Santaraksita on the Emotions 263
Jean-Marie Verpoorten: Some Aspects of Atman According to Prabhakara and Salikanatha 277
Timothy Lubin: The Polity of the Philosopher-Bureaucrat: Brahmanical Virtue as a Qualification for Public Office 299
Shujun Motegi: The Concept of Non-Possession in the Moksa-dharma 327
Paolo Magnone: Aho kausalam apurvam. Hermeneutical wrigglings about the Isopanisad 349
Theory Of World View  
Claus Oetke: 'World View' as a Topic of Research in Indian Studies 369
Brendan Gillon: The Correspondence Principle 381
Stephen H. Phillips: Cannibalising Nyaya Epistemology 399
Hiroshi Marui: The Meaning of a Diversity of Established World Views or Tenets (siddhanta) in the Science of Debate: With Special Reference to Jayanta's Interpretation of the Abhyupagama-siddhanta (NS 1.1.31) and its Evaluation in the Development of Nyaya System 407
General Index 433

 




















Post a Comment
 
Post Review
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy
Based on your browsing history
Loading... Please wait

Items Related to World View and Theory in Indian Philosophy (Philosophy | Books)

Theories of Illusion in Indian Philosophy
by Debamitra Dey
Hardcover (Edition: 2015)
D. K. Printworld Pvt. Ltd.
Item Code: NAL166
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Philosophy Of Value Oriented Education: Theory and Practice
Item Code: IDF923
$35.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Indian Theories Of Meaning
Item Code: IDF857
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Indian Theory of Aesthetics: A Reappraisal
by A.V. Subramanian
Hardcover (Edition: 2005)
Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan
Item Code: IDK246
$16.50
Add to Cart
Buy Now
BEAUTY, ART AND MAN: Studies in Recent Indian Theories Of Art
Item Code: IDF621
$16.50
Add to Cart
Buy Now
A Modern Introduction to Indian Aesthetic Theory
by S. S. Barlingay
Paperback (Edition: 2007)
D. K. Printworld Pvt. Ltd.
Item Code: IDI841
$38.50
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Indian Theories of Creation: A Synthesis
by Dr. K.P. Sinha
Hardcover (Edition: 1985)
Chaukhambha Orientalia
Item Code: IDE320
$14.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Indian Theories of Hermeneutics
Item Code: IDJ443
$40.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Buddhist Theory of Causation and Einstein’s Theory of Relativity
by Filita P. Bharucha
Hardcover (Edition: 1992)
Sri Satguru Publications
Item Code: NAC926
$20.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Testimonials
Thank you very much. It was very easy ordering from the website. I hope to do future purchases from you. Thanks again.
Santiago, USA
Thank you for great service in the past. I am a returning customer and have purchased many Puranas from your firm. Please continue the great service on this order also.
Raghavan, USA
Excellent service. I feel that there is genuine concern for the welfare of customers and there orders. Many thanks
Jones, United Kingdom
I got the rare Pt Raju's book with a very speedy and positive service from Exotic India. Thanks a lot Exotic India family for such a fantabulous response.
Dr. A. K. Srivastava, Allahabad
It is with great pleasure to let you know that I did receive both books now and am really touched by your customer service. You developed great confidence in me. Will again purchase books from you.
Amrut, USA.
Thank you for existing and sharing India's wonderful heritage and legacy to the world.
Angela, UK
Dear sir/sirs, Thanks a million for the two books I ordered on your website. I have got both of them and they are very much helpful for my paper writing.
Sprinna, China
Exotic India has excellent and speedy service.
M Sherman, USA
Your selection of books is impressive and unique in USA. Thank you.
Jaganath, USA
Exotic India has the best selection of Hindu/Buddhist Gods and Goddesses in sculptures and books of anywhere I know.
Michael, USA
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2018 © Exotic India